Saturday, December 5, 2009

Testing123?

We are floating through space, our vision constantly



shifting examining the stars around us. We hear screaming coming,



we look around but we cannot find where the screaming is coming



from. What is happening? Suddenly everything goes black. The scene



changes. A beautiful girl is facing us, she stands up and begins



to walk. We realize that she is in an alleyway. She emerges from



the alley and we begin to rise, away from her, revealing a clear



shot of the monstrously large city that this girl lives in.



Although this girl doesn't realize it yet. these screams are the



cries of her home world, which is in it's death throws and she



is the only person alive that can stop these screams and save



this world. Her name is Aeris (heiress) and she is the last surviving



member of an all but extinct race that holds the key to



defeating a powerful nemesis which craves nothing less than the



very destruction of the planet on which she lives.



Thus, begins Final Fantasy VII, a remarkable RPG that is



masterful in all respects of good story telling and manages to move



us, even while it confuses us to the point of sheer frustration. If



most of us were asked to describe the story of FFVII in one paragraph



(describing it in one sentence would be a run on sentence no matter



how hard we tried), we would probably say something like, "FF7 is the



story of Cloud, Aeris, and their friends who try and save the world



from Sephiroth and the Shinra, who are destroying the Earth. Shinra



is doing it by draining out the Earth鈥檚 Lifestream, the lifeblood of



the planet which is the energy that all living souls are made of,



through its large Mako Reactors. Sephiroth is doing it by summoning a



giant meteor that is going to destroy everything, allowing him to



converge with this energy and claim if for his own to become a 'God.'



Ultimately, the 9 heroes of the game defeat Sephiroth and all the



members of Shinra (although Aeris loses her life in the process) and



unleash Holy, the ultimate white magic, which is the only thing that



can destroy the meteor. It succeeds in doing so but also sucks the



humans, who have been doing all this damage, back into the Lifestream,



realizing that their existence was a terrible error. This leaves only



Nanaki, the teams sentient wolf-like friend, to live out his life



propagating his species on the planet and remembering not to repeat past mistakes."



On the surface, this is a good interpretation of the game.



All of this stuff is shown to us throughout the games development.



But as Alazlam Durai says in Final Fantasy Tactics "we also know that



what we see with our eyes alone isn't necessarily the truth...Won't



you join me on a journey for the 'truth'?" In Final Fantasy VII



we have an apparent story, that seems to fill all the gaps and create



a rather tragic ending for our heroes. But as Bugenhagen says in his



first meeting with Cloud, "Well, that is a bad example. Looking up



too much makes you lose perspective. When it's time for this planet



to die, you'll understand that you know absolutely nothing." Indeed,



Final Fantasy VII also has another story, one that is strewn throughout



the game in fragments and arranged in scattered order. A story in which



the most crucial revelations come in the places where we are least



likely to notice them. It is this story that we will explore in this



segment of this FAQ. I will cite the actual text of the game whenever



making any sort of point about the story.



Part I: Defining the Story



When we first meet Sephiroth he is a cold, emotionless man who



seems almost totally disconnected from the people around him. The only



time we ever hear him talk of anybody with any sense of respect at all



is when he refers to Professor Gast. In contrast to this, Sephiroth



speaks of Hojo, who is revealed to be his father much later in the game,



as "an inexperienced man assigned to take over the work of a great



scientist. He was a walking mass of complexes."



When Sephiroth and Cloud (it is actually Zack who witnesses this



scene and later tells Cloud the story) enter the Mako reactor at



Nibelheim together and discover the monsters contained inside



Sephiroth says, "Now I see, Hojo. But even doing this will never put



you on the same level as Professor Gast." He goes on to explain the



origin of the monsters in this exchange.



Sephiroth: Normal members of SOLDIER are humans who have been



showered with Mako. But what are they? They've been exposed to a high



degree of Mako, far more than you.



Cloud: Is this some kind of monster?



Sephiroth: Exactly. And it's Hojo of Shinra that produced these



monsters (note the foreshadowing right here). Mutated organisms produced



by Mako energy. That's what these monsters really are.



Cloud: Normal members of SOLDIER? You mean you're different?



H..hey, Sephiroth!



Sephiroth:N...no..was I? Was I created this was way too? Am the



same as all these monsters? You saw it! All of them were humans.



Cloud: Human? No way!



Sephiroth: I've always felt, since I was small...that I was



different from the others, special in some way. But, not like this. Am I



...human?



At this point, Sephiroth is clearly freaking out. He starts



striking at the various monster stasis chambers with his sword and also



covers his head with his hands and begins shaking. This shaking is



suspiciously similar to the shaking that Cloud does on his two trips to



destroy the Mako Reactors in Midgar and also does later in the game when



he is being manipulated by Sephiroth. This is very strange, but what is



the connection? When Sephiroth questions how he was created he is on to



something, but the knowledge drives him to insanity before he can find



out the full extent of the truth.



After this, all Hell breaks loose. Sephiroth disappears for



three nights in the Shinra Mansions basement, reading the files which



reveal the nature of his creation. He goes bonkers, burns down the town,



and breaks into the Mako Reactor in the mountains, nearly killing Zack



and Tifa in the process. He is stopped by Cloud who, in anger over the



murder of his friends and his mother, throws him into the Lifestream,



even after having Sephiroth鈥檚 sword shoved straight through him (the same



way Aeris dies). How is it that Cloud, little Cloud, who spends most of



the game being manipulated by Sephiroth, is able to lift up and hurl



"the great Sephiroth" over the ledge? Well he was keeping his promise



to Tifa, for one thing. But more than that, could it be that Cloud is



a lot stronger than he seems while Sephiroth isn't nearly as strong as he seems?



Earlier in the game, when Cloud and Sephiroth Nibelheim, Sephiroth



asks Cloud how it feels to be in his hometown, going on to reveal



that he never had a hometown. When Cloud asks about his family Sephiroth



replies that his mother was Jenova, who died giving birth to him. He



only laughs when he is asked about his father saying, "What does it



matter?" Later on in the game we find out that Jenova is not Sephiroth鈥檚



mother at all. Sephiroth鈥檚 mother is a human woman named Lucretia and



his father is revealed to be Hojo of Shinra Inc. What does this mean?



Later on in the game, we encounter a very different Sephiroth in



the Temple of Ancients. It is in this encounter that Sephiroth reveals



his plan to become a God, hence this exchange.



Sephiroth: Look well.



Cloud: At what?



Sephiroth: At that which adds to the knowledge of (he pauses)



...I am becoming one with the planet. Mother it's almost time, soon we



will become one.



Aeris: How do you intend to become one with the planet?



Sephiroth: It's simple. Once the planet is hurt, it gathers



Spirit Energy to heal the injury. The amount of energy gathered depends



on the size of the injury. What would happen if there was an injury that



threatened the very life of the planet? Think how much energy would be



gathered! Ha! Ha! Ha! And at the center of that injury will be me. All



that boundless energy will be mine. By merging with the energy of the



planet, I will become a new life form, a new existence. Melding with the



planet...I will cease to exist as I am now...Only to be reborn as a



'God' to rule over every soul. Behold that mural.



The Ultimate Destructive Magic...Meteor.



He takes off, telling Cloud to "Wake up!". Aeris reveals that



Meteor is a magical force which propels through space, finding small



planets and crashing into them, thus destroying them. Cloud goes to the



mural and begins to freak out again, his hands covered over his head, his



spirit visibly being removed from his body, symbolizing how disconnected



from reality Cloud is. Afterwards, the group comprises a plan to get the



Black Materia out of the Temple of Ancients. They succeed but Sephiroth



shows up and steals it from them, through his manipulation of Cloud, then



forcing Cloud to attack Aeris. Cloud goes blank and wakes up in a dream,



with Aeris speaking to him through some sort of telepathy in this exchange.



Aeris: Cloud, can you hear me?



Cloud: Yeah, I hear you. Sorry for what happened.



Aeris: Don't worry about it.



Cloud: I can't help it...



Aeris: Oh...then why don't you REALLY worry about it? And let me



handle Sephiroth. And Cloud, you take care of yourself. So you don't have



a breakdown, okay?



Good old, Aeris. She's running in to certain death and she still



has that spark of optimism which permits her to joke about what things



that really aren't very funny. But this exchange is really interesting



because it is one of the main dialogues that presents the nature of the



relationship between Cloud and Aeris. When Aeris and Cloud are on the



Gondola in the Gold Saucer she has this exchange with Cloud,



Aeris: First off, it bothered how you look exactly alike. Two



completely different people, but look exactly the same. The way you walk,



gesture...I think I must have seen him again in you...But, you're different.



Things are different. Cloud...I'm searching for you...



Cloud:?????



Aeris: I want to meet you.



Cloud: But I'm right here.



Aeris: I know, I know what I really mean is, I want to meet...you.



We already know about Aeris' lost love and that his name was Zack



and he was a member of SOLDIER. Yet Cloud, when asked by Aeris in Midgar,



remembers nothing about Zack. Later on in the game, however, we found out



the Zack was the actual member of SOLDIER who was at Nibelheim and



Cloud was just one of the low ranking members. Cloud was totally confused



by his subsequent infusion of Mako and Jenova cells, done by Hojo and it



is over half way through the game before he pieces his reality together.



Yet Aeris sees that Cloud is not all himself ("I'm searching for you.").



She sees his apparent similarities to Zack and knows that something is



not right. Aeris is Clouds connection with his present. Tifa is his



connection with his past, as revealed through her knowledge of the events



of Nibelheim and her disclosure of them to him in the Lifestream. This is



the most of apparent of three character triangles, each involving



Cloud and Aeris, that appear in the game. There exists another one between



Cloud, Aeris, and Zack. There is also a third triangle within the game



that we will explore.



When Cloud and party reach the City of Ancients they try and save



Aeris, but fail miserably, as evidenced when Sephiroth cleanly slides his



sword through her spine, after failing to manipulate Cloud into doing it



for him. Earlier in the game Sephiroth says, "The Jenova Project wanted



to produce people with the powers of the ancients, no, the Cetra. I am the



one that was produced. Professor Gast, leader of the Jenova project,



produced me." This is down right eerie because shortly afterwards, in



Icicle Inn, we find out that Professor Gast was also Aeris' father.



Professor Gast who "produced" Sephiroth and fathered Aeris. This creates a



kind of pseudo brother/sister relationship between Sephiroth and Aeris and



thus reveals the third character triangle found within the game involving



Aeris and Cloud. It also serves as a reminder too how



disconnected Sephiroth is from reality.



After Sephiroth kills Aeris he tells Cloud, "Ha, ha, ha! Stop



acting as if you were sad. There's no need to act as though you're angry



either." He begins to float into the air, "Because, Cloud, you are..." He



trails off, almost as if confused by something, leaving another Jenova



incarnation to stall them. They kill the seemingly puppet creature and it



is Jenova who finishes these five critical words, "Because you are...a



puppet." This is the only time in the game that Jenova speaks. Why is it



Jenova who says this? What does this mean?



The chase for Sephiroth begins again with them chasing him to the



Northern Crater. When Cloud finally confronts Sephiroth in the Nibelheim



illusion, Sephiroth unleashes another shocker, that Cloud is a clone with



false memories who was constructed by Hojo five years before in the



laboratory of the Shinra Mansion. When Tifa, who knows that Cloud wasn't



at Nibelheim, begins to doubt Cloud, he becomes agitated with her.



Sephiroth tells says, "Cloud don't blame Tifa. The ability to change one's



looks, voice, and words is the power of Jenova. Inside of you Jenova has



merged with Tifa's memories, creating you. Out of Tifa's memory, a boy



named Cloud might've just been part of them."



We tend to overlook this line, just as we over look the 'you are



a puppet' line, because of the shock of the revelation Sephiroth makes



to Cloud and Jenova doesn't really seem to be very powerful, but her



abilities of illusion are obviously STRONG. Then again, there are a lot



of things in this game that seem to be something while actually being



something very different. Very interesting, indeed.



In the final battle between Cloud %26amp; Co. against Sephiroth we face



four separate entities. The first of these is Jenova noted by her face



and two enormous tentacles, who is easily dispatched, and we've finally



killed her for good, or have we?



In the second battle we face Bizarro Sephiroth, a monstrous form



of Sephiroth that symbolizes Sephiroth's conversion with Jenova. Look very



carefully at this monster. In the torso area, we can clearly identify



Sephiroth's face, but look on top of the monster above Sephiroth, at the



head, and you'll see Jenova, her two tentacles dangling in front of



Sephiroth. Watch the monsters movement when it attacks. Jenova's two



tentacles lift and begin dangling over Sephiroth's head, like a puppeteer



controlling her favorite puppet.



In the third battle, the most difficult of the four battles, we



face Safer Sephiroth. This angelic form of Sephiroth is highlighted by



its monstrous wing where it's right arm should be. Note the colors of



this wing, blue, white, reddish brown, and black, exactly the same



colors that the three Jenova monsters spread through out the game



consist of. This battle is the one that gives us the true indication of



Jenova's aforementioned power of illusion, hence the ridiculously long



Super Nova summon spell which shows a comet tearing through planets



before detonating the sun, causing a super nova which eats up the rest



of the planets. Also, take note of the translation of the final lyric



in the aria sung during this piece.



"Come, come, o come,



Do not let me die



The winged one of the lower reaches"



In the fourth battle, Cloud fights Sephiroth face to face,



without the power of Jenova to contend with...and utterly slaughters



Sephiroth. Yet, Sephiroth seemed so strong during the game. How can he



be this weak? The answer is simple. Sephiroth seems weak because



Sephiroth is weak. He is merely a puppet of Jenova, hence the



revelation of the true villain of Final Fantasy VII.



So now that we know that Sephiroth's not the real villain,



what exactly is Jenova, anyway? Let's journey to Icicle Inn, watch a



certain video tape which just happens to be titled "The Original Crisis,"



and find out. When we go into Professor Gast鈥檚 old house, we see a video



of him and Ifalna. Ifalna explains that the Cetra were wiped out by



something called 'the Crisis from the Sky.'



This creature was an alien life form that came from outer



space and insinuated itself into the Cetra's various cultures throughout



the world, gained their trust, and then spread a plague into their



society gradually killing almost all of them off. It also crashed



something enormous into the Planet (possibly Meteor), causing a wound,



at the northern crater, which was never able to heal. Ifalna describes



the creatures appearance in this line, "When the Cetra were preparing to



depart from the land they loved...That's when it appeared. It looked like



...our...our dead mothers...and our dead brothers. Showing us spectres



of their past." Whatever this creature was, it had the ability to reach



into people minds and show them illusions, thus altering their memories.



It is interesting that Sephiroth calls the crater the Promised



Land when he kills Aeris, when it is, in fact, an injury that threatens



the planet (another one of the games illusions). After the plague, a



few of the Ancients managed to survive, track the creature down, and



seal it away. However they weren't able to destroy it because of its



remarkable ability to replicate itself. In the second video, we find



out the name of this 'Crisis from the Sky' and the name is, surprise,



Jenova. And poor old brilliant, but doomed Professor Gast, what can he



do with this information but turn away from Ifalna, as if deeply



disturbed by something? Hey, didn't he head up some scientific



experiment for the Shinra called 'The Jenova Project?' or something?



So now we know that Jenova killed off the Cetra, whereas as



Sephiroth puts the blame on "those who appeared that disliked their



journey" for their demise and believes he and Jenova to be the sole



survivors of the Cetra as revealed in his revelation to Cloud/Zack in



the Shinra mansion basement. Jenova was sealed away and forgotten. Two



thousand years later and thirty years before the beginning of the game,



Jenova is rediscovered. In the years that immediately follow a huge



world war breaks out and the first Mako Reactors are created. Is this a



coincidence? When Sephiroth is in the Shinra basement, going insane,



he reads aloud this document "Jenova Project approved. The use of Mako



Reactor number one approved for use." Wow, the first Mako reactor was



set up exactly at the time when the Jenova Project, and the creation



of Sephiroth, was set into motion.



Jenova was not simply manipulating Sephiroth. She was



manipulating everything. She was the founder of the Shinra (translated



as 'God') Corporation. Remember when Cloud freaks out just before he



sets the bombs up that are to destroy the Mako Reactors in Midgar?



This is because he is going against the will of Jenova. She



subliminally guided the scientists under her wing to create Sephiroth,



her 'son.' She set up the Mako Reactors to weaken the planet and



prepare it for its easy destruction. Look at the seal around Holy



before the final battle and you'll see that it consists of a red



colored rock structure, just like Meteor. Jenova used the power of the



Black Materia in order to contain Holy. Remember how the Shinra



originally were weapons manufacturers who grew in wealth from the war



that occurred? She probably started that war as part of her plan to



attain the wealth to build the Mako reactors which would be her tool for



her enslavement of the human race. She even implanted her cells into



the most elite of her army, SOLDIER, in order to have a powerful



fighting force of slaves to serve her. She accomplishes her ends in the



present, just as she did in the past, by insinuating herself into the



ruling society, taking control of it, and manipulating it, all the



while keeping her true self and her efforts unseen.



Part II-The Dramatic Themes of Final Fantasy VII and the



Games Ending



So far we have identified two completely different stories that



exist within FFVII. There is the 'apparent but false' story that shows



the world being destroyed by foolish human beings (Sephiroth and the



Shinra). There is also the 'hidden but true' story that shows us that



Jenova is manipulating everything. In contrast to this we have Cloud,



the apparent protagonist. We also have our hidden protagonist, Aeris



(as Cloud puts it, "She was so close, we couldn't see her") who, in



addition to being the first and last character we see in the game, is



the one who accomplishes the major task (the summoning of Holy) which



saves the life of the planet. Cloud, in turn, attacks Aeris twice and



gives up the Black Materia twice and doesn't start being a productive



member of the party until after his experience in the Lifestream. On



opposite ends of the spectrum, we have Sephiroth our "apparent but



false" antagonist and the "hidden but true" antagonist, Jenova.



Aeris and Jenova are the exact opposite of each other,



different in just about every way possible. Aeris is the last Cetra, a



race that was characterized by its migrations into various star



systems. They would colonize, cultivate, and communicate with these



planets until the eventual move to continue their search for the



Promised Land. Jenova goes onto planets, destroys them, and claims



their life energy for its own. Aeris ('heiress' of the knowledge of



the Cetra) is the symbol for life and truth in the game with her



constant excitement about the future and her own natural abilities



to heal herself and those around her, as well as her insight that



all is not right with Cloud. Jenova, in turn, represents illusion



and destruction in its most absolute form and is also able to



reassemble itself whenever it is dismembered. Note the contrast



between Aeris' healing ability and Jenova's ability to reconstruct



itself after it is destroyed.



Cloud and Sephiroth, by contrast, seem to be less



protagonist/antagonist and more flip sides of each other. Both are



men who have been deceived about their past and want to find out



the truth about themselves, but are mislead from this agenda by



Jenova. Cloud comes to believe that he is a clone of Sephiroth.



Sephiroth comes to believe that Jenova is his mother and that



they are both Ancients when, in fact, his mother is Lucretia, a



human woman and Jenova is an alien creature bent on the



destruction of the Planet for her own rise to power. Both characters are



'puppets' of the monster Jenova. Both characters spend time in



the Lifestream, an experience which sets both of them on their



true path of accomplishment. Both characters are infused with



the Jenova cells at the hands of Hojo.



The terms 'nothing is what it seems' defines the theme



of Final Fantasy VII. In fact, it defines each of the characters



in the game as well. All of the heroes in this game undergo a



realization where they have to confront a belief about their



past which is proved to be false. Let's look at all of them.



Cid spends years blaming Shera for the failure of his



rocket launch. Later on in the game he finds out that the oxygen



tank that she was trying to fix, which stalled his launch, was



actually malfunctioning, just as she said. Shera didn't ruin Cid's



dream, she probably saved his life. Vincent spends years in



stasis, punishing himself for his involvement in the Jenova



project. Later on, he determines that hiding from the problem



won't solve anything and that he must confront it in order to



atone for his past mistakes ("I was frozen in time, but now I



feel my time is just beginning!"). Yuffie spends the first part



of the game trying to steal all the Materia from the group, in



order to help restore the power of her home town, Wutai. Later



on, she realizes that Cloud and his party are the ones who are



really fighting for the future of the human race and that this



fight is her true quest. Cait Sith is really Reeve, of Shinra



Inc. But more so, Cait Sith/Reeve realizes that the



Shinra/Sephiroth/Jenova is the threat, and that Cloud, Aeris,



and Co. are the solution and must come to terms with being



able to betray the Shinra and follow his own morals. Nanaki



believes that is father was a coward who abandoned Cosmo



Canyon to save his own hide. Later on, he finds out that



his father was the hero who saved Cosmo Canyon from destruction



by the Gi Tribe. Tifa believes that something terrible



will happen if she tells Cloud that Zack was the member of



SOLDIER who was really at Nibelheim. Later on in the game,



that knowledge proves to be the key to uncovering the truth



about Clouds past, a revelation that allows him to finally



resist Sephiroth and Jenova and fight against them. Barret



is the mastermind behind the destruction of the first two



Mako reactors, an act he defines as being for the future of



the planet. Later on, Barret says that the Mako reactor



attack was the wrong way of doing things since it cost



innocent people their lives. He goes on to reveal that he



is really fighting for the future of Marlene, his late best



friends daughter.



Cloud, the "false hero" is the most screwed up character



in the game and needs no analysis to prove this. He is the



symbol of 'nothing is what it seems.' He is the character from



whose eyes the story is told, yet he is revealed to have totally



false memories about his past. His true memories aren't revealed



until he and Tifa are in the Lifestream together and even then,



they don't seem to realize that Sephiroth is just Jenova's



slave. This is what serves to make the story so confusing. By



telling the story through Clouds eyes we, the player, see



reality as Jenova wishes Cloud to experience it. Cloud doesn't



realize what is really going on until the end of the game and



never says so out loud, but rather implies it, through this



line, "I think I'm beginning to understand...an answer from



the planet."



Aeris, the hero, is the most honest character in the



game yet, as Tifa puts it, "She talked about the future more



than any of us...Although she never talked about it to us, she



must've had a rough life...I think Aeris looked forward to



tomorrow and the future more than anyone...She must've had



many, many dreams..."



In the epilogue of the game, which takes place five



hundred years after the games conclusion, we see Nanaki and



his children running up a hill to reveal a shot of a long



abandoned Midgar and the plant (planet) life that has grown



over it. There are no humans to be seen anywhere. The most



common argument I've heard in defining the meaning of this



ending is that humans caused the destruction and were summoned



back into the Lifestream by Holy because they were a



mistake. From the reality presented on the surface of the



game, this is the strongest argument. Yet, we also know



that most of what is evident about Final Fantasy VII is



false. The truth of the game is subtly told in various



hints spread throughout the game.



Humans were a creation of the planet. They existed



within the natural cycle of the planet, posing no real



threat to it. The destruction in this story is all caused



by Jenova, who is an alien life form which exists outside



of the natural cycle of the planet and manipulates this



cycle (namely, humanity and the Cetra) to achieve her own



ends. What does the epilogue with Nanaki really show us?



Midgar was virtually trashed during Meteors descent into



the planet and would have been long since abandoned by



humanity in the five centuries that passed on the planet



between the games ending and its epilogue if they indeed



continued to exist after Holy is released.



To understand the contrast between the 'apparent



but false' ending and the 'hidden but true' ending, you



merely have to look at the very, very end of the game.



After the conclusion of the epilogue, the Final Fantasy



VII logo appears and we hear a strange noise. This sound



consists of birds chirping, water flowing, and various



other sounds of the cycle of nature. Listen closely and



you'll also hear the laughter of children contained



within these sounds, hence a possible revelation that



humanity does not vanish at the games end.



But this isn't the only evidence of this that is



contained within the game. To understand this, you must



look closely at the games ending before the credits occur



. After Cloud defeats Sephiroth in the fourth of the



games four battles, Sephiroth explodes into Lifestream



energy that has is colored RED, signifying the



contamination of his life force by Jenova. Red is the primary



color of both Jenova and Meteor. Watch this scene closely.



Cloud is left standing alone. A stream of light emerges



from the ground and circles around Cloud. This stream is



clearly Holy as it is identical to the streams that later



emerge from the Planet and destroy Meteor. The red Life-



stream energy of Sephiroth also surround Cloud and enter



him. Holy then enters Cloud, combining with him and the



Sephiroth/Jenova life force, culminating in a bright flash



of light. This bright flash of light also occurs at the



end of the game when Holy is vanquishing Meteor, only we



don't get to see what happens afterwards, which is why



understanding this scene is so important to understanding



the meaning of the games ending. After, the flash of light,



Holy vanishes. The Sephiroth life force emerges once again



from Cloud, only this time it is colored GREEN. This all



symbolizes the cleansing of both Cloud and Sephiroth of



the Jenova life force that is inside of them by Holy.



Notice that Cloud does not vanish after this encounter.



Indeed, only moments later, the airship is propelled out



of the Northern Crater by Holy. Again, neither the team,



nor the airship vanishes. In fact, their lives are



virtually saved by Holy's movement. If they'd remained in



the Northern Crater, they'd all have certainly died.



Remember this exchange that the team has with Bugenhagen



at the City of Ancients, which is also the most commonly



misinterpreted line in the game. (I'll capitalize the



most important words in this dialogue to illustrate my



point.)



Bugenhagen: The knowledge of the Ancients swirling



around here is telling me one thing. The planet's in a



crisis...A crisis beyond human power or endless time. It



says when the time comes, we must search for 'Holy.'



Cloud: Holy?



Bugenhagen: Holy...the ultimate White Magic. Magic



that might stand against Meteor. Perhaps our last hope to



save the planet from Meteor. If a soul seeking Holy reaches



the Planet, it will appear. Ho, Ho, Hoooo. Meteor, Weapon,



everything will disappear. PERHAPS, even ourselves.



Cloud: Even us?



Bugenhagen: It is up to the planet to decide. What



is best for the Planet. What is bad for the Planet. ALL THAT



IS BAD WILL DISSAPPEAR. THAT IS ALL. Hoo, hoo, hoo, I wonder



which we humans are?



So it seems that the humans didn't disappear after



all. It was bold move on Square's part to make sure that this



game could only be understood through its subtleties. After



all, they spent thirty million dollars on this game, they



must have felt obligated to create an RPG that had a



challenging story as well as an entertaining one. This is an art



form after all. 'Normal' RPG's offer endings that provide



closure to the characters. Final Fantasy VII has an ending



which offers no closure and can only be understood through the



subtle hints that are dropped throughout the game. I guess



we all would have liked to see what "really" happens afterward,



but then again, how often is it that we see a story that is



truly original?



Yet, just as everything in the 'apparent' story of



this game is contrasted by the 'hidden' story, there exists



another riddle within the game to finalize this contrast. There



are two mysteries that remains unexplained, the meaning of



Aeris' hand reaching towards Cloud after his cleansing of



Jenova, which is signified by her musical theme, a theme



which is only played during parts of the story that relate



to her. The other mystery is what the appearance of Aeris in



the final scene of the game, showing her head lifting up and



her eyes opening. Does this symbolize Aeris returning to the



Planet or does it symbolize her being resurrected? After all,



the last thing she says to Cloud is, "Then, I'll be going now.



I'll come back when it's all over." The truth is that the only



way to understand the meaning of this puzzling riddle is to



understand the mythology that Final Fantasy VII is based on.



This is what we shall explore in the next segment of this FAQ.



Part III: The Riddle of the Promised Land



Sephiroth鈥檚 name comes from the Jewish mystical text,



the Kaballa. Sephiroth鈥檚 goal in the game is his Jenova



influenced desire to converge with the Planet and become a God.



The murder of Aeris manipulates the player into hating Sephiroth,



thus diverting our attention from the fact that he is



really just a tragic character who is being manipulated by



Jenova. Note the look of horror on his face as he dies. Sephiroth



obviously wasn't afraid of dying. It was his goal to



kill his body and become a new life form. His fear at the



end of the game seems to imply a terrifying revelation, as



if he has suddenly realized what was being done to him and



the terrible actions it caused him to perform. Personally,



I like to think that Sephiroth鈥檚 life energy visits his real



mother, Lucretia, to say good-bye and then returns to the



planet.



The Sefirot of the Kabbalah represent the ten branches



of the Tree of Life which are interconnected by twenty-two



paths. The first nine branches are symbolized in the game by



its 9 heroes. The tenth branch is called Malkut and is



characterized by Harry Gersh in his work, "The Sacred Book of the



Jews," like this, "Malkut has no special attributes but is a



kind of funnel through which the qualities of the upper nine



sefirot are transmitted to the physical world. It is therefore



also called Shechinah, the Spirit of God." Malkut, the tenth



branch, is portrayed in the game by the White Materia (Remember



what Aeris first says about the White Materia, "...but mine is



special. It is good for absolutely nothing." This quote from



George Sassoon and Rodney Dale in their work, "The Mana



Machine," illustrates Sephiroth and his fate perfectly, "To



the Babylonians, it [the Tree of Life] was a tree with magical



fruit, which could only be picked from the gods. Dire



consequences befell any mortal who dared to pluck from its



branches."



The Kaballah also speaks of an eleventh, hidden branch.



This branch is called Da'ath and is represented in the game by



the Lifestream. This quote from Rebecca Salem describes the Da'



ath, "Here is the highest point of the human mind: the home of



the brainstorm or creative energy that is brought into



manifestation on the earthly plain."



In Celtic Mythology, the development of which was



highly influenced by the mystical ideas found in the Kaballah,



magic is a process of altering the structure of the physical



reality through the sheer force of ones own will. The use of



magic requires one to gain mastery over the five elements,



Earth, Water, Air, Fire, and Spirit and use them in the



construction of spells. Note how this parallels the magical



system of Final Fantasy (and almost every other RPG in existence),



which features magical spells based on all these



elements. As Bugenhagen puts it when he first meets Cloud,



"Spirit energy is a word you should never forget."



Celtic Mythology often uses numbers to symbolize



mystical ideas. Three and all multiples of three are the fundamental



numbers which were believed to have magical power.



Nine was considered the most important of these multiples



for its ability to return to itself. If you multiply nine by



any single digit number and then add the two numbers you



get as your answer, their sum will always be nine (Example:



2x9=18, 1+8=9/ 6x9=54, 5+4=9).



In Final Fantasy VII, the number 3 and all its



multiples are employed in a strange repetition. (Just before



the final battle, Barrett says, "Look at the number.") Here is



a list of some examples.



1. There are three characters in the players party at



any one time.



2. There are nine characters in the game total (Note



that Sephiroth is in your party briefly during Clouds flash-



back bringing the number to 10, the same number as the



branches found on the tree of life. This is another way of



symbolizing that Sephiroth is a victim, not a villain.)



3. There are three incarnations of Jenova fought



during the game (Jenova Birth, Life, and Death)



4. There are six primary characters which lead the



Shinra at the beginning of the game (President Shinra, Hojo,



Scarlet, Heidegger, Palmer, and Reeve) When President Shinra



dies, Rufus immediately shows up, stabilizing the number.



5. On the world map, there are a total of thirty



locations which can be entered (I counted these up by looking



at the world map in the official strategy guide. There were



actually 36 locations, but six of them were just chocobo



tracks, although this still comes to another multiple of



three.)



6. Each character has 6 Limit Break attacks which



come naturally to them (except Cait Sith, who only has two,



which is one third of six, and is not a real character, but



rather Reeve of Shinra.) The seventh limit break can only



come through mastery of the fist six.



7. Aeris, the true hero, is the third character we



meet in the game (after Cloud and Barrett). Note that we



don't learn Aeris' name until after we meet Tifa, making her



seem to be character number four (another contrast between



the 'apparent' and 'hidden' realities of the story.)



8. In the games final battle we fight four different



monsters. Yet each of these four monsters represent 3



different forms of both Sephiroth and Jenova. Numerically, the



pattern can be illustrated like this, with the left side



representing Jenova and the right side, Sephiroth:



1-2/3-3/2-1. If you add these numbers up (1+2+3+2+3+1) you



will get 12, another multiple of 3. Note that 4 (the number



of battles) times 3(the number of forms of Jenova and Sephiroth)



also equals 12. If you add only the center numbers



of the conversion up (2+3+2+3) you will get 10, the number



of spheres on the Tree of Life, which represents the state



of immortality that Sephiroth/Jenova are trying to attain.



9. There are 69 floors in the Shinra headquarters.



'69' is a numerical symbol for convergence (as well as



being...well, you know ). Shinra translates as meaning



'God.' If you put these to words into a sentence summarizing



Jenova's goal in the game you'll come up with something like,



"Jenova wishes to destroy the planet and 'converge' with its



Lifestream energy to become a 'God.'" (Square sure did put



some intense planning into this game, didn't they?)



10. There are 241 species of monsters spread through-



out this game (not counting the final battle). Multiply 2x4



and then add 1 and you will get 9.



11. The first Cait Sith is destroyed in the Temple



of Ancients and is replaced by another. Add another 1 (Reeve)



to this 2 and you get 3.



12. In the Mural room in the Temple of Ancients,



there are nine pillars in the room, eight on the wall and



one different looking pillar, characterized by a sphere at



its top, that is located on the altar on the right side of



the room. There are eight torches in the room with another



point of light represented by the Black Materia illusion floating



above the pillar. The Black Materia illusion is a light



color when we first see it, but turns dark after we touch it.



I've found other repetitions of three in the game, but



I've basically illustrated my point enough for the numerical



pattern to become evident. Replay the game and look for your-



selves. All of the characters ages in the game are multiples of



three with the exception of Aeris, Tifa, and Yuffie (all of



which are potential love interest for Cloud, although it is



very difficult to see the 'date' with Yuffie, and I have never



taken the time to get it). Aeris' age is 22, the same as the



number of paths interconnecting the branches of the Tree of



Life. Tifa's age is 20, I'm not really sure what this means,



but I think that zero in the number may be meant to somehow



symbolize Tifa's secret from Cloud. Yuffie's age is sixteen,



multiply 1x6 and you get six, which is still a multiple of



three (Yuffie is also the sixth character found in the game,



if you find her at your earliest opportunity, just before



you first reach Junon.)



As I mentioned earlier, in Final Fantasy VII there



are three character triangles involving Cloud and Aeris.



These are:



1.Cloud, Aeris, and Zack



2. Cloud, Aeris, and Tifa



3. Cloud, Aeris, and Sephiroth.



Add the numerical points of these character triangles



and you will get 9, the number that always returns to itself.



These triangles serve to illustrate various choices



that Cloud makes during the game which are fundamental to his



growth. The choice between Tifa and Aeris is very obvious and



is up to the player to decide. The choice between Zack and Aeris



is personified when Cloud emerges from the Lifestream and vows



to live without lying to himself. Zack represents the false



past that Cloud constructed for himself under Jenova鈥檚 influence.



Aeris represents Clouds connection to reality ("I'm searching



for you.") The choice between Aeris and Sephiroth is



personified when Cloud refuses to obey Sephiroth鈥檚 command and



kill Aeris at the end of the first disc. If Cloud chooses Aeris



in the Tifa/Aeris triangle, then Aeris becomes the point of



focus for all three triangles. Here is a visual illustration



of these triangles.



(C=Cloud, A=Aeris, T=Tifa, S=Sephiroth, Z=Zack)



C



S/A Z/A



C A/T C



If you look at these triangles carefully, you will notice



that there is a fourth, inverted triangle within the structure



where Aeris is the three points of focus. Note that the points



of focus are in the center, with Cloud being represented on the



outside of the triangle. Aeris within Cloud. What does this mean?



As Cloud puts it in his conversation with Tifa at the end of disc



2, "Everybody has an irreplaceable something they鈥檙e holding onto."



In the Tree of Life, the first nine sefirot are grouped



in threes. Each triad is comprised of a masculine element, a



feminine element, and a combining element. The three triads



represent 1. the world of thought 2. the world of emotions and



morality and 3. the world of nature. Note how this parallels the



above structure. Even Tifa can be determined as the masculine



element as she is presented in the game as being somewhat of a



tomboy with many masculine traits (she is a martial arts expert



who wears men鈥檚 clothes), whereas Aeris is more of an angelic waif



and very, very feminine to boot.



Each one of the three triads on the Tree of Life symbolize



a different element. The first represents the world of thought and



is personified by the choice between Zack and Aeris, which occurs



inside Clouds head while he is in the Lifestream with Tifa. The



second represents the world of emotion and morals and is personified



by Clouds choice between Tifa and Aeris, his two love interests.



The third triad represents the world of nature and is



personified by Clouds refusal to kill Aeris at Sephiroth/Jenova鈥檚



command.



Everything in the 'apparent' and 'hidden' stories has



parallel contrasts. There is also a second trilogy of character



triangles in this story. These triangles consist of:



1. Hojo, Jenova, and Sephiroth



2. Hojo, Jenova, and Lucretia



3. Hojo, Jenova, and Professor Gast



The structure can be illustrated like this (H=Hojo,



J=Jenova S=Sephiroth, G=Gast, L=Lucretia):



H



L/J G/J



H S/J H



Once again, each of these triangles is brought into focus



by a choice Hojo makes. His choice between Jenova and Sephiroth



(his son) is personified when he chooses to inject the cells of



Jenova into Sephiroth while he is in the womb (the world of



thought). The second choice is personified when he chooses to



give Lucretia, his lover who is carrying is child, to Professor



Gast鈥檚 Jenova Project and then doesn't allow her to see the child,



thus creating the illusion for Sephiroth that Jenova is his real



mother (the world of emotions and morals.) The third choice is



made when Hojo has Professor Gast killed (the world of nature.)



If you add the number of characters in these two trilogies



together (5+5) you get another 10. If you subtract Sephiroth,



who appears once in both sets of trilogies, you get another 9



(damn, this is gettin' trippy!).



The inverted triangle, which is highlighted in these



structures by the three connecting points of Aeris and Jenova,



is an important symbol in Celtic Mythology. It is called the



Triangle of Manifestation. This triangle symbolizes the creation



life through three points:



God (Masculine Element) Goddess (Feminine Element)



Manifest Creation



The three triangles of Hojo illustrate the choice Hojo



made that ultimately lead to the creation of the "false"



Sephiroth, who never had any real choice except to become a



slave of Jenova. The three triangles of Cloud seem to symbolize



that Cloud somehow keeps Aeris alive, but how is this possible.



Let's take a look at some of the hints regarding this that are



spread throughout the game.



When President Shinra dies, we see Sephiroth鈥檚 sword



shoved through him in exactly the way he kills Aeris later on.



He is immediately replaced by his son, which could foreshadow



Aeris' rebirth.



When Aeris speaks to Cloud in his dream before taking



off to the City of the Ancients the last thing she says is,



"The secret is just up here. At least it should be. I feel it. It



feels like I'm being lead by something. Well, I'll be going now.



I'll come back when it's all over." This line implies that Aeris



knows that she is being protected by something far greater than



herself and that she will be safe if she prays for Holy, no matter



what happens. After all, she knows that Sephiroth is going to be



after her. She probably also knew that Jenova was the real threat



because her mothers voice would have told her. Also remember that



Holy is "the Ultimate White Magic," which is the magic of Healing.



If any magic could perform a resurrection, it is Holy.



When Tifa and Cloud are on their way to revisit the City



of Ancients to find out what Aeris was really doing there, they



have this exchange:



Tifa: I wonder what Aeris felt when she was on that altar.



Cloud: I'm sure she wanted to give her life for the planet



Tifa: Really? I wonder? I don't think that's it at all. I



think she didn't think she would die at all., but that she planned



on coming back all along. She always used to talk about the 'next



time.' She talked about the future more than any of us...



When we re-enter the church at Midgar, we see a specter of



Aeris that disappears if we get too close. Aeris has not returned



to the Planet yet, but why not? What is she waiting for?



When Aeris runs away from Cloud in the Sleeping Forest



dream, we see her run into a white sphere of light, symbolizing



Holy. If you look closely as Aeris falls through the waters during



her burial, notice that she falls into a sphere. As the fade out



occurs a circular light surrounding the sphere, grows smaller and



smaller as she falls, as though it is absorbing her body.



In the games ending, there are two appearances of Aeris.



The first is the hand reaching from the white light of Holy out



to Cloud, as though Holy is creating a new body for her. This could



also symbolize Aeris reaching out to Cloud to pull him into Holy



and back into the Lifestream with her since, when the scene shifts



back to reality, Cloud is about to fall off the ledge he is standing



on and die. In the first scene of the game, we see Aeris' head



facing straight at us, her eyes already open (life). When Sephiroth



draws his sword from her body we see her eyes close (death). In



the final scene we see Aeris' head nodding upward and her eyes



opening (returning to the Planet or resurrection).



We have already established that many major truths in this



game are illustrated in the places where we are most likely to



notice them. The most fundamentally absurd scene in the game is the



show at the Gold Saucer during Aeris' and Clouds date. The scene



is so goofy that we are totally encouraged to play it as



mischievously as possible (another way the game diverts us from its



truths). Let's look at the entire scene through the path to the



happy ending. I will add what I think to be the secret references



to the story and what they mean in parenthesis.



Narrator: Long, long ago...An evil shadow appeared over the



peaceful kingdom of Galdia (Jenova, "the winged one of the lower



reaches," who started reaping her destruction upon the planet 30



years before the game begins) Princess Rosa was just kidnapped by



the Evil Dragon King Valvados (Aeris was killed by Sephiroth/Jenova)



What will become of her (what is Aeris' true fate?) Just then, the



legendary hero, Alfred, appears!



Knight: Oh...you must be the legendary hero...Alfred! Hey,



it's your line! (It's your decision to make) Yeah, you. Ahem! Oh,



you must be the legendary hero...Alfred! I know in my soul.



Please...please save princess Rosa (In your soul you can save Aeris)



On the peak of a dangerous mountain...dwells the Evil Dragon King,



Valvados (In the Northern Crater dwells Jenova. Note that both



Jenova and Valvados have three syllables in their names) who's kid-



napped Princess Rosa (who has killed Aeris)...But you can't beat the



Evil now (Cloud is still too confused about himself to fight Jenova)



talk to the one who can help you (Talk to Tifa Lockheart, who holds



'locked' within her 'heart,' the key to Clouds true past)...



Cloud has two choices 1. The knight (a symbol of force) 2.



The wizard (a symbol for wisdom) Let's have Cloud choose the wizard.



Wizard: I am the great wizard, Vorman (I am truth) What do



you wish to know?



Cloud: The evil dragon kings weakness (Jenova鈥檚 weakness)



Vorman: Ahh, the weakness of the Evil Dragon King. It must



be, it must be..Yes! It must be True Love (Truth and Love)! The



power of love...Is the only weapon that can withstand the fangs of



the evil dragon king (Only love can save Aeris from death) Oh,



what is going to happen next! (Only Cloud can decide Aeris' fate)



Oh...legendary hero...look!



EDK: Aaah! I am the Evil Dragon King....Valvados (I am



Jenova) I have not harmed the princess (Aeris is being contained



inside Holy, which has been sealed) I have been expecting...you!



Aeris: Please help me legendary hero! (Please save me from



Jenova, Cloud!) psst... like that?



EDK: Gaah! Here I come legendary hero...Alfred! I already



know your name (I have been controlling you all along).



Vorman: And now legendary here...Here is what will happen...



to your beloved...A kiss! The power of True Love!! (Aeris will



return through Clouds love)



Aeris: Cloud, I mean Alfred!



EDK:Arrgh! Curses...The power of...love!!!



King: Oh, look! Love has...triumphed (Clouds love has



brought back Aeris) Now let's all return and celebrate!



Narrator: Oh, how profound the power of love (profound means



'within,' Holy is contained at the center of the planet) And so the



legendary hero %26amp; our story live happily ever after (Cloud defeats



Jenova and Sephiroth and finds Aeris in the Promised Land)



All this stuff here is based on choice that Cloud (the



player) makes. Every important element in this game means something



different that what it seems to mean on the surface.



If you choose Tifa over Aeris, it breaks the points of focus



that symbolize Aeris and the Triangle of Manifestation. I think that



Aeris' resurrection is determined by whom Cloud chooses in the love



triangle. If Cloud chooses Aeris, he completes the Triangle of



Manifestation and brings Aeris back, through the power of love, when



he is touched by Holy (Note that Aeris hand appears immediately after



Cloud is touched by Holy and this scene immediately shifts to a shot



of Tifa鈥檚 hand reaching towards Cloud). If he chooses Tifa, Aeris goes



back into the Lifestream. After all, any good RPG will often let you



decide something fundamental to the fate of your protagonist.



Remember what Aeris says about the Promised Land, "You don't



'know' where the Promised Land of the Ancients is. You search and



travel until you feel it. Like you just know, '...this is the



Promised Land.'"



The Promised Land is not a place, but something you find in



your heart. When Cloud is snapped back into reality at the end of the



game, he says to Tifa, "I think I'm beginning to understand. An answer



from the planet...The Promised Land...I think I can meet her there."



Cloud somehow knows that he can bring Aeris back by keeping her



alive in his heart. If Cloud loves Aeris then she is his Promised



Land, thus providing the explanation for her resurrection when Cloud



is touched by Holy. But Aeris loves Cloud no matter how he feels. If



Cloud chooses Tifa over her, then she has no real reason to come back.



She is better off in the Lifestream with her own race. This



resurrection/Lifestream return riddle is somewhat ambiguous. But, when



you understand the mythological references in the game, the choice



between Aeris and Tifa steers it to a more likely possibility, which



is why I think this determines Aeris' fate.



I think Square put this riddle in the game as a sort of



'reward' for people who take the time to read about the mythology on



which the game is based. They wanted to encode something in the game



which could only be understood by understanding the most subtle levels



of the game.



I can really see why Square of Japan translated FFVII



themselves. There was just way too many symbolic elements encoded



into the game for them to risk it all being ruined by having someone



else translate it. FFVII touches a level of depth in both its dramatic



story telling and in its symbolism that has never been approached by



another RPG. I've never played a video game which has challenged me



more in it's requirement of the player to think about it's story in



order to understand it. This is a very confusing story and I hope



that I've done a good job of explaining the tale and its intriguing



mythological basis. If I've done my job right, then may this FAQ



serve as an affirmation of appreciation that inspires the many FFVII



fans to play the game once again, with new eyes...



Testing123?comedy show



Testing WHO dillwad. Go to your "expert" %26amp; tell him to bite me!



Testing123?greek theater opera theater



check!
Duh.....
Your computer is working fine. Now you can submit a question.
Testing mic test.. mic test..

Catholics,what do you make of THIS?

666, The Number of the Beast



--------------------------------------...



Rev 13:16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:



Rev 13:17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.



Rev 13:18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.



Note that according to verse 17, there are three different characteristics that distinguish the beast:



his mark (of authority)



his name



the number of his name (666).



It might be argued by some that 666 must be applied to one man's name, and that this will then help identify him as the antichrist. I would offer the following verse to show that 666 need not apply solely to a man's name:



Rev 19:16 And he hath on his vesture and on his thigh a name written, KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS.



The same Greek word translated as name (onoma: G3686) that appears in Revelation 13:17-18 is also used in chapter 19:16, so clearly the word can also apply to a title, and not just one man's name. Now, we are told that it takes a certain understanding and wisdom to discern just how this number is actually applied. Based on the fact that 666 can apply to a title, below are several words and phrases that have been put forth over the centuries as probable solutions to the enigma of 666.



GREEK



The numeric equivalents of Greek letters can also be found in the Encyclopedia Britannica under "Languages of the World", Table 8.



The ancient Greek word for "the Latin speaking man" is LATEINOS



L = 30 lambda



A = 1 alpha



T = 300 tau



E = 5 epsilon



I = 10 iota



N = 50 nu



O = 70 omicron



S = 200 sigma



------------



666



NOTE: Latin is the official language of the Roman Catholic Church. Church Documents are usually published first in Latin, and then translated from the Latin into other languages. The association of "Lateinos" with 666 was first suggested by Iren?us (ca. 130-202 A.D.) who proposed in his Against Heresies that it might be the name of the fourth kingdom in Daniel 7:7.



Then also Lateinos has the number six hundred and sixty-six; and it is a very probable [solution], this being the name of the last kingdom [of the four seen by Daniel]. For the Latins are they who at present bear rule: I will not, however, make any boast over this [coincidence].



Source: Against Heresies, by Iren?us, Book 5, chapter 30, paragraph 3.



St. Irenaeus biography online at the New Advent Catholic web site.



The ancient Greek for



"The Latin Kingdom" is



HE LATINE BASILEIA



BASILEIA is Strong's # G932 The ancient Greek for



"Italian Church" is



ITALIKA EKKLESIA



EKKLESIA is Strong's # G1577 And in ancient Greek



the word APOSTATES And in ancient Greek



the word for "tradition"



PARADOSIS



Strong's # G3862



H = 0 (transliterated)



E = 8 eta



L = 30 lambda



A = 1 alpha



T = 300 tau



I = 10 iota



N = 50 nu



E = 8 eta



B = 2 beta



A = 1 alpha



S = 200 sigma



I = 10 iota



L = 30 lambda



E = 5 epsilon



I = 10 iota



A = 1 alpha



--------------------------------------...



666



I = 10 iota



T = 300 tau



A = 1 alpha



L = 30 lambda



I = 10 iota



K = 20 kappa



A = 1 alpha



E = 5 epsilon



K = 20 kappa



K = 20 kappa



L = 30 lambda



E = 8 eta



S = 200 sigma



I = 10 iota



A = 1 alpha



--------------------------------------...



666



A = 1 alpha



P = 80 pi



O = 70 omicron



ST = 6 stigma*



A = 1 alpha



T = 300 tau



E = 8 eta



S = 200 sigma



--------------------------------------...



666



* Stigma is a now obsolete Greek character, but it appears in the New Testament in Rev 13:18 to give the value 666 (chi xi stigma - See Strong's Concordance, # G5516).



P = 80 pi



A = 1 alpha



R = 100 rho



A = 1 alpha



D = 4 delta



O = 70 omicron



S = 200 sigma



I = 10 iota



S = 200 sigma



--------------------------------------...



666



--------------------------------------...



LATIN



--------------------------------------...



NUMERAL NAME VALUE



I unus 1



V quinque 5



X decem 10



L quinquaginta 50



C centum 100



D quingenti 500



M mille 1000



VICARIUS FILII DEI



THE LITERAL MEANING: VICARIUS - substituting for, or in place of



FILII - means son



DEI - means God



V = 5 F = no value D = 500



I = 1 I = 1 E = no value



C = 100 L = 50 I = 1



A = no value I = 1 -------------



R = no value I = 1 501



I = 1 --------------



U = 5 53



S = no value



---------------



112 112 + 53+ 501 = 666



DUX CLERI



translated means Captain of the Clergy



D = 500



U = 5



X = 10



C = 100



L = 50



E = no value



R = no value



I = 1



--------------------



666



LUDOVICUS



translated means Vicar of the Court



L = 50



U = 5



D = 500



O = no value



V = 5



I = 1



C = 100



U = 5



S = no value



--------------------



666



--------------------------------------...



HEBREW



--------------------------------------...



The numeric equivalents of Hebrew letters can be found in the Encyclopedia Britannica under "Languages of the World", Table 50.



ROMIITH



means the Roman Kingdom



R = 200 resh



O = 6 waw (vav)



M = 40 mem



I = 10 yod



I = 10 yod



TH = 400 taw



--------------



666



ROMITI



means the Roman Man



R = 200 resh



O = 6 waw (vav)



M = 40 mem



I = 10 yod



T = 400 taw



I = 10 yod



----------



666



--------------------------------------...



Note:



Lateinos, Ecclesia Italika, and Romith are cited as possible solutions by Johannes Gerhard (1582-1637), a Lutheran, in his Adnotationes in Apocalypsin, page 110.



Romith, Vicarius Filii Dei, Dux Cleri, Ordinarius Ovilis Christi Pastor, and Dic Lux are cited by the rector of Berlin, Andreas Helwig [or Helwich] (1572-1643) in his Antichristus Romanus.



Dux Cleri is cited by Walter Brute (or Britte), a fourteenth century follower of Wycliff, in his Registrum, page 356.



Ludovicus was proposed by James Bicheno (d. 1831), a British minister and author, applying it at the time to the French King Louis XIV, as the two-horned beast from the earth.



He Latine Basileia and Lateinos are cited by Alexander Campbell (1788-1866), founder of the Disciples of Christ, in A Debate on the Roman Catholic Religion of 1837.



See The PROPHETIC FAITH OF OUR FATHERS, The Historical Development of Prophetic Interpretation, by Le Roy Edwin Froom, Volumes II and IV, published by the Review and Herald Publishing Association, Washington D.C., Copyright 1948.



--------------------------------------...



This relationship of 666 in Greek, Latin, and Hebrew is only one relatively small, yet important indicator that the Papacy is the Antichrist and the beast from the sea of Revelation 13. This association by itself proves little, as 666 can fit other people using the same methods. All the other biblical characteristics of the Antichrist must be considered and met as well, then this association becomes significant.



--------------------------------------...



666 and C?SAR NERO



Some will suggest that the book of Revelation was written only for those living at the time, and that 666 most probably applies to C?sar Nero, who ruled Rome from 54 to 68 A.D., rather than someone from latter centuries. This point of view, which suggests Revelation had an immediate application to the first century, rather than being prophetic, is known as preterism, and is commonly held by the Catholic Church. So, just how is Nero linked to 666?



The preterist takes a relatively uncommon form of Nero's name, Nero C?sar or C?sar Nero, and adds an "n", resulting in Neron C?sar. Next the Latin is transliterated into Aramaic, resulting in nrwn qsr, which when using the numeric equivalent of the letters, then adds up to 666 as follows:



Nun = 50



Resh = 200



Waw = 6



Nun = 50



Qoph = 100



Samech = 60



Resh = 200



An example of this spelling has apparently been recently discovered in one of the Dead Sea scrolls. If you use the same process, but without the added "n" the result is 616. Interestingly, some early manuscripts have 616 rather than 666, but even scholars such as Iren?us [A.D. 120-202] attribute the 616 to only a copyist error (Against Heresies: Book V Chapter XXX.), "this number [666] being found in all the most approved and ancient copies" [of the Apocalypse] and asserts that "men who saw John face to face bearing their testimony" [to it - 666].



There is a problem though with the above calculation. According to the rules of Jewish numerology, known as gematria, when the letter Nun appears a second time in a word, it is known as a "Final", and takes the value of 700.* So to be precise, NRWN QSR actually adds up to 1316 and not 666.



*Source: Behind Numerology, by Shirley Blackwell Lawrence, copyright 1989, published by Newcastle Publishing Co., Inc., North Hollywood, California, ISBN 0-87877-145-X, page 41.



So the preterist calculation which attributes 666 to Nero, however, is nothing more than a rather desperate attempt to find some likely candidate for the Antichrist other than the Papacy.



THE WORD ANTI-



Look up in Strong's Concordance word 473 in the Greek dictionary. You will find the the word anti is often used to denote substitution-



473. anti, an-tee'; a prim. particle; opposite, i.e. instead or because of (rarely in addition to):--for, in the room of. Often used in composition to denote contrast, requital, *substitution*, correspondence, etc.



An example of how anti is used this way can be found in the words type and antitype, which are used with respect to Bible prophecy. The "type" is the pattern or symbol, and the antitype is the fulfillment. The Jewish Passover was a "type" and the crucifixion of Jesus is the "antitype" or fulfillment of the example of the type. You substitute the antitype into the symbolism of the type to arrive at the complete meaning.



The Catholic Church has essentially confirmed this usage of the word anti. In the 1994 Catholic Almanac on page 158 there is "the list of men who claimed or exercised the papal office in an uncanonical manner." So these men tried to substitute themselves for the true Pope, and usurp that office, so to speak. The Catholic church denies the papal authority of the men on that list because they attempted a substitute (false) claim on the Papacy. That list is a list of ANTI-POPES! So the word anti can clearly mean a substitute for something.



THE WORD ANTICHRIST



Antichrist (word 500 in Strong's Greek dictionary) can be correctly interpreted then, as someone who substitutes himself for Jesus Christ, the Son of God, just as an antipope substituted himself into the office of the Papacy.



The Vicar of Christ (Vicarius Christi)



"Vicar of Christ . . . Title used almost exclusively of the Bishop of Rome as successor of Peter and, therefore, the one in the Church who particularly takes the place of Christ; but used also of bishops in general and even of priests. First used by the Roman Synod of A.D. 495 to refer to Pope Gelasius; more commonly in Roman curial usage to refer to the Bishop of Rome during the pontificate of Pope Eugene III (1145-1153). Pope Innocent III (1198-1216) asserted explicitly that the Pope is the Vicar of Christ; further defined at the Council of Florence in the Decree for the Greeks (1439) and Vatican Council I in Pastor Aerternus (1870). The Second Vatican Council, in Lumen Gentium , n.27, calls bishops in general "vicars and legates of Christ." All bishops are vicars of Christ for their local churches in their ministerial functions as priest, prophet, and king, as the Pope is for the universal church; the title further denotes they exercise their authority in the Church not by delegation from any other person, but from Christ Himself."



Source: Catholic Dictionary, Peter M.J. Stravinskas, Editor, published by Our Sunday Visitor, Inc., Huntington, 1993, pp. 484-485.



THE WORDS VICARIOUS AND VICAR



Now look up the word vicarious in almost any common dictionary. Here is what you would find in the Webster Handy College Dictionary: "substituting for or, feeling in place of another."



Also in the Webster's II New Riverside Desk Dictionary for the definition of Vicar-



1. A parish priest in the Church of England.



2. A cleric in the Episcopal Church in charge of a chapel.



3. One who serves as a *substitute* for another.



A Vicar General is defined in the 1994 Catholic Almanac on page 330 as "a priest or bishop appointed by the bishop of a diocese to serve as his deputy, with ordinary executive power, in the administration of the diocese." So a vicar serves in the place of (substituting for) the bishop, and assumes his power of office for certain duties.



So the Papal title of VICAR OF CHRIST which in Latin is VICARIUS CHRISTI, means a SUBSTITUTE FOR CHRIST, which is synonymous with Antichrist, i.e., assuming the power of God on earth! This blasphemous claim is made repeatedly by various Popes and is the very foundation of Roman Catholicism and it's Papacy.



Some Catholics may protest that the Pope represents, but does not substitute for Jesus Christ, to avoid the association.



Now, from the Webster Hand College Dictionary, the definition of the word represent:



1. portray; depict; describe.



2. play the role of; impersonate.



3. denote; symbolize; stand for.



4. speak and act for; *be a substitute for*.



5. set forth; assert.



6. be composed of; consist in.



Clearly then, Vicar of Christ (Vicarius Christi) and Antichrist have exactly the same meaning. The Pope substitutes himself in place of God on earth, and that is *exactly* the meaning of Antichrist.



--------------------------------------...



VICAR OF THE SON OF GOD



--------------------------------------...



Some Catholics will claim that the title VICARIUS FILII DEI is an anti-catholic fabrication, a complete fake, never used by the Catholic church. One example of this is online at the Catholic Envoy Magazine in the article titled Pope Fiction by Patrick Madrid (See Fiction 5). My complete discussion with Patrick Madrid.



The following evidence is offered to prove that VICARIUS FILII DEI is indeed genuine.



Vicarius Filii Dei translated in English is Vicar of the Son of God, a phrase that has been used by Catholics:



[pg. 140]



... there are Catholics who talk against the temporal power of the Pope, either because they have been stunned by the clamours of a Protestant people, or because they are white-hearted, and have not courage to stand in the face of popular falsehood for an unpopular truth. The spirit of Protestant Englandits lawlessness, its pride, its contempt, and its enmity to the Church of Godhas made Catholics too to be cold-hearted, even when the Vicar of Jesus Christ is insulted. We have need, then, to be upon our guard. It shall happen once more with some, as it did when the Son of God was in His Passionthey saw Him betrayed, bound, carried away, buffeted, blindfolded, and scourged; they saw Him carry His Cross to Calvary, then nailed upon it, and lifted up to the scorn of the world; and they said, "If he be the king of Israel, let him now come down from the cross, and we will believe him."* So in like manner they say now, "See this Catholic Church, this Church of God, feeble and weak, rejected even by the very nations called Catholic. There is Catholic France, and Catholic Germany, and Catholic Italy, giving up this exploded figment of the temporal power of the Vicar of Jesus Christ." And



* St. Matt. xxvii. 42.



[pg. 141]



so, because the Church seems weak, and the Vicar of the Son of God is renewing the Passion of his Master upon earth, therefore we are scandalized, therefore we turn our faces from him. Where, then, is our faith? But the Son of God foretold these things when He said, "And now I have told you, before it come to pass; that when it shall come to pass, you may believe."*



* St. John xiv. 29.



[pg. 230]



... Lastly, the only other point upon which I shall speak to is this. We have already seen how the powers and glories of the Holy See have been progressively unfolding; how the time of St. Gregory I. was a period of apostolic missions, converting the nations to the faith; how the time of St. Leo III. was a period



[pg. 231]



of creating the Christian world; how the time of St. Gregory VII. was a period of purifying the sanctuary of the Church; and how the time of Alexander III. was a period of royalty of government and of ecclesiastical order, when the divine power of the church directed, by a firm and sacred authority, the civil powers of the world within the sphere of the law of God and of obedience to the faith. Now I observe these powers of the Holy See have been always rising, always culminating. The temporal power in the hand of St. Gregory I. was a fatherly and patriarchal rule over nations not as yet reduced to civil order. In the hands of St. Leo III. it became a power of building empires. In the hands of St. Gregory VII. it was a scourge to chasten them. In the hands of Alexander III. it was a dynasty, ruling supremely, in the name of God, over the powers of the world. And now in these later times the temporal sovereignty has become a law of the conscience, an axiom of the reason. Through long contests and denials it has passed into consciences, intellects, and hearts of men. Like the great dogmas of the Church, through controversy it has reached its analysis and expression. It stands by the side of the Immaculate Conception a theological certainty, if not a definition. So that I may say there never was a time when the temporal power of the Vicar of the Son of God, though assailed as we see it, was more firmly rooted through-



[pg. 232]



out the whole unity of the Catholic Church in the hearts and convictions of its members; and that by a double process, not only by its own proper evidence, not only by the light of God's dealing with the world, but by contrast. For the nations of Europe have already seen that the society of the world, without the guidance and preservation of the Church of God, resolves itself into confusion. They have seen every form of political society, and the confederations of kingdoms and nations, dissolve and pass away. While all the floating societies of the world have drifted down the stream, the centre of obedience has become more stable. Men have learned from the history of modern Europe that the law which is called the law of nations—that is, the rule of justice which regulates the relations of people with people—has become weak and powerless. And why? Because the nations have broken the bonds which bound them to the centre of obedience, and have shaken off the noble submission to a tribunal higher than man, from which came forth, in other days, the judgments of equity and of justice. It was a dignified obedience to bow to the Vicar of the Son of God, and to remit the arbitration of their griefs to one whom all wills consented to obey.



Source: The Temporal Power of the Vicar of Jesus Christ, by Henry Edward Manning, D.D. (appointed Archbishop of Westminster in 1865 and Cardinal in 1875), second edition with a preface, published in 1862 in London by Burns %26amp; Lambert, 17 %26amp;18 Portman Street.



--------------------------------------...



From "Crossing The Threshold of Hope", by Pope John Paul II:



First Chapter: "The Pope": A Scandal and a Mystery (bold emphasis is mine):



[pg. 3] The leader of the Catholic Church is defined by the faith as the Vicar of Jesus Christ (and is accepted as such by believers). The Pope is considered the man on earth who represents the Son of God, who "takes the place" of the Second Person of the omnipotent God of the Trinity.



[pg. 13] The Pope is not the only one who holds this title. With regard to the Church entrusted to him, each bishop is Vicarius Christi.



Note that on page three of the Pope's book, "represents the Son of God" is synonymous with "Vicar of Jesus Christ". A vicar clearly represents, substitutes for, or "takes the place" of another, as stated. Consequently "represents the Son of God" can be translated in Latin as Vicarius Filii Dei, which in Roman Numerals will add up to 666. The title Vicarius Christi, translated into English, means a substitute for Christ, i.e., Antichrist, as demonstrated above, which is applied by the Pope to every bishop of the Catholic Church!



--------------------------------------...



VICARIUS FILII DEI



The Historical Proof.



--------------------------------------...



The Donation of Constantine is the most famous forgery in European history. Originally discovered in the Pseudo-Isidorian Decretals in the 9th century (c. 847-853), which are now also recognized to be forgeries, parts of the Donation of Constantine were later incorporated into most of the medieval collections of Catholic canon law (Anselm's, Cardinal Deusdedit's (c. 1087), and Gratian's Decretum (c. 1148) also known as Concordia Discordantium Canonum). So the Donation of Constantine was held to be genuine for centuries.



The Donation of Constantine is cited in writing by no less than 10 Popes as proof of their civil authority and sovereignty over Rome, and what came to be known as the Papal States, which included a large portion of Italy. It was eventually exposed as a pious fraud in 1440 by Laurentius Valla who proved it had to have been written several centuries after the death of Constantine (337 A.D.) The Vatican condemned Valla's scholarly work by listing it in the Index Librorum Prohibitorum, the Index of Prohibited Books of 1559. The donation reads in part as follows in Latin: (caps added for emphasis) -



... sicut B. Petrus in terris VICARIUS FILII DEI esse videtur constitutus, ita et Pontifices, qui ipsius principis apostolorum gerunt vices, principatus potestatem amplius quam terrena imperialis nostrae serenitatis mansuetudo habere videtur, conscessam a nobis nostroque imperio obtineant...



In English that is-



... as the Blessed Peter is seen to have been constituted vicar of the Son of God on the earth, so the Pontiffs who are the representatives of that same chief of the apostles, should obtain from us and our empire the power of a supremacy greater than the clemency of our earthly imperial serenity is seen to have conceded to it,



(continuing beyond the Latin above)



choosing that same chief of the apostles and his vicars to be our constant intercessors with God. And to the extent of our earthly Imperial power, we have decreed that his holy Roman Church shall be honored with veneration, and that more than our empire and earthly throne the most sacred seat of the Blessed Peter shall be gloriously exalted, we giving to it power, and dignity of glory, and vigor, and honor imperial. And we ordain and decree that he shall have the supremacy as well over the four principal seats, Alexandria, Antioch, Jerusalem, and Constantinople, as also over all the churches of God in the whole earth. And the Pontiff, who at the time shall be at the head of the holy Roman church itself, shall be more exalted than, and chief over, all the priests of the whole world, and according to his judgment everything which is provided for the service of God and for the stability of the faith of Christians is to be administered.



Source: Donation of Constantine, quoted in Christopher B. Coleman's The Treatise of Lorenzo Valla on the Donation of Constantine, pp. 12,13 Copyright 1922 by Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn.



As one example of the Donation of Constantine being incorporated into Catholic canon, in Gratian's Decretals of the Canon Law of the Roman Catholic Church, published in Bologna about 1148, the following is found:



"Beatus Petrus in terris vicarius filii Dei videtur esse constitutus."



Decretum Gratiani, prima pars., dist. 96.



Below is a copy of the cover page of Catholic Canon Law (Corpus Iuris Canonici) and Gratian's Decretals published in 1879 in Germany by Emil Friedberg:



The Donation of Constantine is quoted in column 342, part of which is shown below. The phrase "vicarius filii dei" is found near the center of the paragraph. (Note that a "u" is used in place of a "v".)



The Bavarian State Library of Germany has a digitized searchable 1879 version of Corpus Iuris Canonici available online, including scans of all the pages (page 342 in GIF [low resolution] and PDF format [high resolution] ). The relevant section is found under the following headings:



- CONCORDIA DISCORDANTIUM CANONUM AC PRIMUM DE IURE NATURAE ET CONSTITUTIONIS



- DISTINCTIO XCVI.



- C. XIV. De eodem.



Vicarius Filii Dei in the text of the Donation of Constantine in an 1869 Vatican printing of Cardinal Deusdedit's Canon Law (compiled in 1087 A.D.) online at Google books. Deusdedit's bio.



Photos of a 16th century copy of the Donation are online at the Vatican Secret Archive web site. The phrase vicarius filli Dei appears at the end of the 5th line down of the left page of the 7th photo. The image below is enlarged by 100% and sharpened to make it readable. See also this page, #11.



rime sanitati comperi me restitutum, utile



judicauimus una *** nostris satrapibus



omnibus et universo Senatu optimatibus It



et cuncto populo Romanae gloriae imperij



subiacenti, ut sicut in terris vicarius filii Dei



esse videtur constitutus etiam et pontifices,



qui ipsius principes Apostolorum gerunt



--------------------------------------...



According to the 1913 Catholic Encyclopedia, regarding the Donation of Constantine:



The first pope who used it in an official act and relied upon, was Leo IX; in a letter of 1054 to Michael C?rularius, Patriarch of Constantinople, he cites the "Donatio" to show that the Holy See possessed both an earthly and a heavenly imperium, the royal priesthood. ... Gregory VII himself never quoted this document in his long warfare for ecclesiastical liberty against the secular power. But Urban II made use of it in 1091 to support his claims on the island of Corsica. Later popes (Innocent III, Gregory IX, Innocent IV) took its authority for granted (Innocent III, Sermo de sancto Silvestro, in P.L., CCXVII, 481 sqq.; Raynaldus, Annales, ad an. 1236, n. 24; Potthast, Regesta, no. 11,848), and ecclesiastical writers often adduced its evidence in favour of the papacy. The medieval adversaries of the popes, on the other hand, never denied the validity of this appeal to the pretended donation of Constantine ... The authenticity of the document, as already stated, was doubted by no one before the fifteenth century.



Source: The 1913 Catholic Encyclopedia online at the New Advent web site.



In the Chapel of St. Sylvester (part of the Basilica of Santi Quattro Coronati, located in Rome on Coelian hill, between St. John Lateran and the Coliseum), a series of frescoes commissioned by Pope Innocent IV, and completed in 1246, depict various events in the life of Pope Sylvester I.



The Donation of Constantine, Santi Quattro Coronati, Rome.



In one of the fresco panels, shown above, Emperor Constantine is offering his crown to the Pope, illustrating the Donation of Constantine. In the following panel, the triumphal Pope, riding on horseback and wearing Constantine's tiara, is led through Rome by the humbled Emperor, who is on foot.



Another painting representing the Donation of Constantine, shown below, is in the Vatican, in the Sala di Costantino. It was painted by Raphael and his workshop from 1519 to 1525, along with depictions of Constantine's baptism, his vision of the cross, and his victory at the battle at Milvian bridge, so at the time it would seem the Donation of Constantine was still considered to be genuine.



Detail of the Donation of Constantine as depicted in a painting by



Gianfrancesco Penni, in the Sala di Costantino, the Vatican.



For the whole painting, see The Art of Renaissance Rome, by Loren Partridge,



published by Harry N. Abrams, Inc., New York, A Times Mirror Company,



Copyright 1996 by Calmann %26amp; King, Ltd., ISBN 0-8109-2718-7, page 158.



The kneeling Constantine is handing Pope Sylvester I a statuette of Roma Aeterna (eternal Rome) symbolizing the transfer of power from the emperor to the papacy. On February 23, 1520, about four years before the Raphael's painting of the Donation was completed, Martin Luther, in a letter to Spalatin, wrote:



I have at hand Lorenzo Valla's proof that the Donation of Constantine is a forgery. Good heavens, what darkness and wickedness is at Rome. You wonder at the judgment of God that such unauthentic, crass, imprudent lies not only lived, but prevailed for so many centuries, that they were incorporated in the canon law ... and became as articles of faith. I am in such a passion that I scarcely doubt that the pope is the Antichrist expected by the world, so closely do their acts, lives, sayings, and laws agree.



Source: The Art of Renaissance Rome, by Loren Partridge, published by Harry N. Abrams, Inc., New York, A Times Mirror Company, Copyright 1996 by Calmann %26amp; King, Ltd., ISBN 0-8109-2718-7, page 159.



9. ... All these excessive, over-presumptuous, and most wicked claims of the Pope are the invention of the devil, with the object of bringing in antichrist in due course and of raising the Pope above God, as indeed many have done and are now doing. It is not meet that the Pope should exalt himself above temporal authority, except in spiritual matters, such as preaching and absolution; in other matters he should be subject to it, according to the teaching of St. Paul (Rom. xiii.) and St. Peter (I Peter iii.), as I have said above. He is not the vicar of Christ in heaven, but only of Christ upon earth. For Christ in heaven, in the form of a ruler, requires no vicar, but there sits, sees, does, knows, and commands all things. But He requires him "in the form of a servant" to represent Him as He walked upon earth, working, preaching, suffering, and dying. But they reverse this: they take from Christ His power as a heavenly Ruler, and give it to the Pope, and allow "the form of a servant" to be entirely forgotten (Phil. ii. 7). He should properly be called the counter-Christ, whom the Scriptures call antichrist; for his whole existence, work, and proceedings are directed against Christ, to ruin and destroy the existence and will of Christ.



It is also absurd and puerile for the Pope to boast for such blind, foolish reasons, in his decretal Pastoralis, that he is the rightful heir to the empire, if the throne be vacant. Who gave it to him? Did Christ do so when He said, "The kings of the Gentiles exercise lordship over them, but ye shall not do so" (Luke xxii. 25, 26)? Did St. Peter bequeath it to him? It disgusts me that we have to read and teach such impudent, clumsy, foolish lies in the canon law, and, moreover, to take them for Christian doctrine, while in reality they are mere devilish lies. Of this kind also is the unheard-of lie touching the "donation of Constantine." It must have been a plague sent by God that induced so many wise people to accept such lies, though they are so gross and clumsy that one would think a drunken boor could lie more skillfully. How could preaching, prayer, study, and the care of the poor consist with the government of the empire? These are the true offices of the Pope, which Christ imposed with such insistence that He forbade them to take either coat or scrip (Matt. x. 10), for he that has to govern a single house can hardly perform these duties. Yet the Pope wishes to rule an empire and to remain a pope. This is the invention of the knaves that would fain become lords of the world in the Pope's name, and set up again the old Roman empire, as it was formerly, by means of the Pope and name of Christ, in its former condition.



Source: Luther's Address To The Nobility of the German Nation, 1520.



The forged Pseudo-Isidorian Decretals, among which was found the Donation of Constantine, are fictitious letters alleged to be from early popes [Clement (A.D. 100) to Gregory the Great (A.D. 600)], collected by Isidore Mercator in the 9th century. Since the scholarly criticism of the fifteenth century they have been known to be forgeries and have been called "Pseudo-Isidorian Decretals" or False Decretals, to acknowledge that they are fraudulent, none the less, as late as 1580 the official edition of the Corpus Juris, upheld the genuineness of the False Decretals. Catholics finally abandoned the defense of the authenticity of the Donation of Constantine shortly after Cesare Baronius published his Ecclesiastical Annals in 1592, which admitted the fraud, although the Donation and title Vicarius Filii Dei continued to appear in Canon law and other Catholic publications well into the 19th century.



Lucius Ferraris, about 1755, wrote an elaborate multi-volume theological reference work or encyclopedia titled Prompta Bibliotheca in which he quoted the Donation of Constantine, including the phrase Vicarius Filii Dei, in article 2 of the entry "Papa" (Pope). He cited the revised canon law as his authority. Here is the cover page of volume 5, of an edition published in 1858, note that it carries the blessing of Pope Gregory XVI - (SANCTISSIMI D. N. GREGORII XVI P.M.)



Below is part of column 1828 from volume 5 of Prompta Bibliotheca, 1858 Paris edition, where the title of Vicarius Filii Dei appears in #20 of article 2 of the entry "Papa" (Pope), which I have indicated with an arrow. Again, this is a quote from the Donation of Constantine:



Full scanned pages from Prompta Bibliotheca.



Ferraris' work was later revised, enlarged, and once again published in Rome in 1890. In that edition, the document and papal title Vicarius Filii Dei were still retained. (Lucius Ferraris, Prompta Bibliotheca (Rome, 1890), Vol. VI, p. 43, col. 2.)



According the 1913 Catholic Encyclopedia, a further revised edition of Prompta Bibliotheca was published in Rome by the presses of the Vatican's Office of Propaganda in 1899.



So, for well over 600 years, the Donation of Constantine was held by the Roman Catholic Church to be a valid document transferring authority from Emperor Constantine and it does contain the Latin title Vicarius Filii Dei. This is irrefutable proof that it is not a Protestant invention. The title continued to appear in Catholic publications even into the 20th century.



--------------------------------------...



In the Nov 15, 1914 Edition of Our Sunday Visitor, (a Catholic publication), the following question was addressed on page 3 in the section titled Bureau of Information:



Is it true that the words of the Apocalypse in the 13th Chapter, 18th verse refer to the Pope?



The words referred to are these "Here is wisdom. He that hath understanding, let him count the number of the beast. For it is a the number of a man: and the number of him is six hundred sixty-six." The title of the Pope in Rome is Vicarius Filii Dei. This is inscribed on his mitre[*]; and if you take the letters of his title which represent Latin numerals (printed large) and add them together they come to 666.



V I C A R I V S F I L I I D E I



5 1 100 1 5 1 50 1 1 500 1



Add these together and the result will be 666.



This "argument" was submitted to Rev. Ernest R. Hull, and answered in the following manner: "Almost every eminent man in Christendom, who has enjoyed the privilege of possessing enemies, has had his name turned and twisted till they could get the number 666 out of it. In past history there have been numberless beasts or Anti-Christs, all of whose names counted up to 666. I fancy that my own name, especially in Latin form, might give the number of the beast:



E R N E S T V S R E G I N A L D V S H V L L



5 1 50 500 5 5 50 50 =666



Quod erat demonstrandum, namely, that Rev. Ernest R. Hull is Anti-Christ, or the Beast of the Apocalypse!"



Perhaps a little ingenuity with your name will show that you are the beast of the Apocalypse too.



View a facsimile copy of the above item online.



The top of page one.



Editorial information from page 2. Contains sanctions for the editor from Pope Pius X, dated May 17, 1914; from Archbishop John Bonzano of Melitene, the Apostolic Delegate to the U.S., dated April 27, 1913; and from H. J. Alerding, Bishop of Fort Wayne, Indiana., dated March 29, 1912.



Rev. Ernest R. Hull S. J. was editor of The Examiner of Bombay, India, a Catholic newsweekly.



--------------------------------------...



*[The Vatican's Papal Sacristy has more than a dozen papal triple (triregno) crowns, which are properly called tiaras. The papal mitre, of which there have been very many, is quite different. A mitre is shown below on the right.]



Pope John XXIII



wearing a triple tiara. Pope John Paul II



wearing a papal mitre.



Again in the April 18th, 1915 edition of Our Sunday Visitor, Rev. John F. Noll, editor, the following question was addressed on page 3, in the section titled Bureau of Information:



What are the letters supposed to be in the Pope's crown, and what do they signify, if anything?



The letters inscribed in the Pope's mitre are these: Vicarius Filii Dei, which is the Latin for the Vicar of the Son of God. Catholics hold that the church which is a visible society must have a visible head. Christ, before His ascension into heaven, appointed St. Peter to act as His representative. Upon the death of Peter the man who succeeded to the office of Peter as Bishop of Rome, was recognized as the head of the Church. Hence to the Bishop of Rome, as head of the Church, was given the title "Vicar of Christ."



Enemies of the Papacy denounce this title as a malicious assumption. But the Bible informs us that Christ did not only give His Church authority to teach, but also to rule. Laying claim to the authority to rule in Christ's spiritual kingdom, in Christ's stead, is not a whit more malicious than laying claim to the authority to teach in Christ's name. And this every Christian minister does.



View a facsimile copy of the above item online.



The top of page one.



Editorial information from page 2. Contains sanctions for the editor from Pope Pius X, dated May 17, 1914; from Archbishop John Bonzano of Melitene, the Apostolic Delegate to the U.S., dated April 27, 1913; and from H. J. Alerding, Bishop of Fort Wayne, Indiana., dated March 29, 1912.



--------------------------------------...



It was not long before the editors of Our Sunday Visitor made a very curious change, completely contradicting what they themselves had previously stated regarding Vicarius Filii Dei (and cited above). The following is from the Bureau of Information section in the September 16, 1917 edition:



What application has the number 666 to Pope Benedict XV?



—None whatever. Such an interpretation of Chapter XIII, Verse 18 of the Apocalypse is entirely unfounded and is nothing more than a display of malignant hatred. It is the effervescense of vacuous minds. Earlier commentators spent considerable time in trying to determine the personality of the beast, and they referred it to Nero Caesar; for by supplying the numerals for the Hebrew characters in his name, the number 666 was obtained. During the period of the Reformation and for years after, the Apocalypse furnished the basis of much political and religious incrimination. In later years, really reliable commentators have ceased the silly prattle about the Popes, Napoleon, Rome and subjecting the Book to the Rules of exegesis see a reference to conditions existing at the time of St. John. (This interpretation, of course, does not include the Resurrection, the millennium, and the plagues preceding the consummation of the world, as referring to principle events in the first century). In a "Dictionary of the Bible" edited by William Schmidt, a Protestant author, page 1038, will be found the following; "Ebrard reckons that not less than eighty systematic commentaries are worthy of note, and states the less valuable writings on this inexhaustible subject are unnumbered if not innumerable. Fanaticism, theological hatred, and vain curiosity may have largely influenced their composition." Also on page 1039 we find the following: "Against the Historical scheme it is urged, that its advocates differ very widely among themselves; that they assume without any authority that the 1260 days are so many years; that several of its applications—e.g., of the symbol of the ten-horned beast to be the Popes, and the sixth seal to the conversion of Constantine—are inconsistent with the context; that attempts by some of this school to predict future events by the help of Revelation have ended in repeated failures.



Besides, if present-day writers are so anxious to see the fulfillment in the person of the Pope, why not be consistent? Such interpreters have never shown that the title "Vicarius Filii Dei" is really inscribed upon the Pope's tiara. Moreover, the passage states that the number refers to a man, in other words the numerals represented by the letters in his name, which total the sum 666. The words Vicarius Filii Dei are not the name of the Pope, they do not even constitute his official title. The name of our President is Woodrow Wilson. His title is President of the United States. If we take the name Benedict XV and follow out the same numerical addition, we find that his number instead of being 666 would be 1123.



This question was submitted to Rev. Earnest R. Hull and answered in the following manner: "Almost every eminent man in Christendom, who has enjoyed the privilege of possessing enemies, has had his name turned and twisted till they could get the number 666 out of it. In past history there have been numberless beasts or Anti-Christs, all of whose names counted up to 666. I fancy that my own name, especially in Latin form, might give the number of the beast:



E R N E S T V S R E G I N A L D V S H V L L



5 1 50 500 5 5 50 50 =666



Add these together and the result will be 666.



Quod erat demonstrandum, namely, that Rev. Ernest R. Hull is Anti-Christ, or the Beast of the Apocalypse!"



Since the war fanatical "private interpreters" have made the number 666 refer to the Kaiser; others even to President Wilson.



View a facsimile copy of the above item online.



--------------------------------------...



The University of Notre Dame has the above editions of Our Sunday Visitor on microfilm.



--------------------------------------...



Our Sunday Visitor is still in business:



Our Sunday Visitor



200 Noll Plaza



Huntington, Indiana 46750



Phone: (800) 348-2440



--------------------------------------...



The most plausible name we have ever seen suggested as containing the number of the beast, is the blasphemous title which the pope applies to himself, and wears in jeweled letters upon his miter or pontifical crown. That title is this: Vicarious filii Dei: "Vicegerent of the Son of God." Taking the letters out of this title which the Latins use as numerals, and giving them their numerical value, we have just 666. Thus we have V, 5; I, 1; C, 100; (a and r not used as numerals;) I, 1; U (formerly the same as V) 5; (s and f not used as numerals;) I, 1; L, 50; I, 1; I, 1; D, 500; (e not used as a numeral;) I, 1. Adding these numbers together, we have just 666.



The following extract on this point is from a work entitled "The Reformation,"[*] bearing the date of 1832:―



"Mrs. A., said Miss. Emmons, I saw a very curious fact the other day; I have dwelt upon it much and will mention it. A person, lately, was witnessing a ceremony of the Romish church. As [pg. 226] the Pope passed him in the procession, splendidly dressed in his pontifical robes, the gentleman's eye rested on these full, blazing, letters in front of his miter: "VICARIOUS FILII DEI," The Vicar of the Son of God." His thoughts, with the rapidity of lightning, reverted to Rev. xiii, 18. Will you turn to it? said Mrs. A. Alice opened the New Testament and read: 'Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast; for it is the number of a man; and his number is six hundred three score and six.' She paused, and Miss. Emmons said, He took out his pencil, and, marking the numerical letters of the inscription on his tablet, it stood 666."



Here we have indeed the number of a man, even the "man of sin;" and it is a little singular, perhaps providential, that he should select a title which shows the blasphemous character of the beast, and then cause it to be inscribed upon his miter, as if to brand himself with the number 666.



[*] The Reformation: A True Tale of the Sixteenth Century, by Anne Tuttle Jones Bullard, published in 1832 by the Massachusetts Sabbath School Society, Boston, Massachusetts, pgs. 247-248. Identification by Jerry A. Stevens, October 9, 2006.



Source: Thoughts, Critical and Practical, on the Book of Revelation, by Uriah Smith, published in 1865 by the Steam Press of the Seventh-day Adventist Publishing Association, Battle Creek, Michigan, pgs. 225-226.



Note that Anne Bullard, on page 247, presents the title with the word VICARIVS, the old Latin spelling that uses a "V" for a "U". This is likely to be the form of the word used if it appeared on a papal tiara or mitre. Uriah Smith on the other hand, misquotes Bullard, using the unlikely English spelling, VICARIOUS, which has "OU". Smith in his later publications changes this to the more modern Latin, VICARIUS, using only a "U", as shown below, which also may be the way it was inscribed with jewels on the papal mitre or tiara.



--------------------------------------...



. . . The most plausible expression we have seen suggested as containing the number of the beast, is the title which the pope takes to himself, and allows others to apply to him. That title is this: Vicarius Filii Dei, "Vicegerent of the Son of God." Taking the letters out of this title which the Latins used as numerals, and giving them their numerical value, we have just 666. Thus we have V, 5; I, 1; C, 100; (a and r not used as numerals); I, 1; U (formerly the same as V), 5; (s and f not used as numerals); I, 1; L, 50; I, 1; I, 1; D, 500 (e not used as a numeral); I, 1. Adding these numbers together, we have just 666.



This title, there is reason to believe, was formerly inscribed upon the pope's crown. The following testimony on this point is given by the late Elder D. E. Scoles, of Washburn, Mo.:—



"I have met two men who declare that they have seen this specific crown; and their testimony is so perfectly in agreement that I am convinced that what they saw is true. The first man was M. De Latti, a Sabbath-keeper who had previously been a Catholic priest, and had spent four years in Rome. He visited me when I was pastor in St. Paul, Minn., several years ago. I showed him my tract, 'The Seal of God and the Mark of the Beast.' He at once told me that the inscription was not correctly placed in my illustration. He stated that he had often seen it in the museum at the Vatican, and [pg. 625] gave a detailed and accurate description of the whole crown. When my tract was published [Feb. of 1895], I was ignorant of the arrangement of the words of the Latin inscriptions, hence, in the illustration of the crown, placed them in one line. Brother De Latti at once pointed out the mistake, and said the first word of the sentence was on the first crown of the triple arrangement, the second word on the second part of the crown, while the word Dei was on the lower division of the triple crown. He also explained that the first two words were in dark-colored jewels, while the Dei was composed entirely of diamonds.



"During a tent-meeting which I held in Webb City, Mo., I presented the subject, 'The Seal of God and the Mark of the Beast.' I used charts to illustrate it, one being a reproduction of the crown as Brother De Latti had described it. A Presbyterian minister was present, Rev. B. Hoffman, and when I described the crown, he spoke out publicly and made a statement to the congregation, saying that while in Rome studying for the priesthood, he had seen this very crown, and noted its inscription, and that the word Dei was composed of one hundred diamonds. I met him and learned his name, and visited him at his home, and was convinced from his description that this was the identical crown that Brother De Latti had seen, but which has been denied by many. I then asked him for a written statement, and he gave me the following:—



" ' To Whom It May Concern: This is to certify that I was born in Bavaria in 1828, was educated in Munich, and was reared a Roman Catholic. In 1844 and 1845 I was a student for the priesthood in the Jesuit College in Rome. During the Easter service of 1845, Pope Gregory XVI wore a triple crown upon which was the inscription, in jewels, Vicarius Filii Dei. We were told that there were one hundred diamonds in the word Dei; the other words were of some other kind of precious stones of a darker color. There was one word upon each crown, and not all on the same line. I was present at the service, and saw the crown distinctly, and noted it carefully.



" ' In 1850 I was converted to God and to Protestantism. Two years later I entered the Evangelical Church ministry, but later in life I united with the Presbyterian Church, of [pg. 626] which I am now a retired pastor, having been in the ministry for fifty years.



" ' I have made the above statement at the request of Elder D. E. Scoles, as he states that some deny that the pope ever wore this tiara. But I know that he did, for I saw it upon his head.



" ' Sincerely yours in Christian service,



(Signed) " ' B. HOFFMAN.



[Balthazer Hoffmann]



" ' Webb City, Mo., Oct. 29, 1906.' "



The following extract is from a work entitled The Reformation,[*] bearing the date of 1832:—



" ' Mrs. A.,' said Miss Emmons, ' I saw a very curious fact the other day; I have dwelt upon it much, and will mention it. A person, lately, was witnessing a ceremony of the Romish Church. As the pope passed him in procession, splendidly dressed in his pontifical robes, the gentleman's eye rested on these full, blazing letters in front of his miter: "VICARIUS FILII DEI," the Vicar of the Son of God. His thoughts, with the rapidity of lightning, reverted to Rev. 13:18.' 'Will you turn to it?' said Mrs. A. Alice opened the New Testament and read: 'Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.' She paused, and Miss Emmons said, 'He took out his pencil, and marking the numerical letters of the inscription on his tablet, it stood 666.' "



Here we have indeed the number of a man, even the "man of sin;" and it is a little singular, perhaps providential, that he should select a title which shows the blasphemous character of the beast, and then cause it to be inscribed upon his miter, as if to brand himself with the number 666.



[*] The Reformation: A True Tale of the Sixteenth Century, by Anne Tuttle Jones Bullard, published in 1832 by the Massachusetts Sabbath School Society, Boston, Massachusetts, pgs. 247-248. Identification by Jerry A. Stevens, October 9, 2006.



Source: Daniel and the Revelation. The Response of History to the Voice of Prophecy: A Verse by Verse Study of These Important Books of the Bible, by Uriah Smith, Southern Publishing Association, Nashville, Tennessee, copyright 1907 by Mrs. Uriah Smith, (published sometime after May of 1911), pgs. 624-626.



Elder D. E. Scoles' account was also published in the Advent Review and Sabbath Herald, Dec, 20, 1906, page 10.



--------------------------------------...



I have received what seems to be reliable information that a photo may exist (similar to the one below) of a papal funeral in St. Peter's Basilica near the beginning of the 20th century, in which the tiara inscribed with Vicarius Filii Dei can be seen. Combined with the above claims of Our Sunday Visitor, this would indicate that it was the funeral of either Leo XIII (1878-1903), or Pius X (1903-1914), and that previous popes probably wore the tiara in question. If anyone can turn up any photos and make them available to me, I will post them in this article.



LEO XIII



The Trenton Times of New Jersey reported on July 23rd, 1903, that during the first of nine days of mourning for Pope Leo XIII, his coffin was publicly displayed on a catafalque in the choir chapel opposite the Chapel of the Sacrament, surmounted by a triple tiara.



The Reno Evening Gazette reported on July 28th, 1903, that for a requiem Mass for Leo XIII, a large catafalque was placed in the Sistine chapel, and on top of it was displayed a triple tiara on two cushions.



Catafalque in the Sistine chapel for the requiem Masses for Pope Leo XIII.



A triple tiara can be seen at the top.



PIUS X



The Syracuse Herald of New York reported on August 21, 1914 that the body of Pope Pius X lay in state wearing pontifical vestments, to include a triple crown.



The Nevada State Journal of Reno reported on August 29th, 1914 that at the first of three funeral Masses for Pope Pius X in the Sistine chapel, attended by nearly 50 cardinals, a triple crown was displayed on a large catafalque.



The body of Pope Pius X (who died in 1914) on display in front of St. Peter's high altar during a Pontifical Mass on May 30th, 1954, celebrating his canonization as a Saint the prior evening. A papal tiara can be seen on top of the glass-sided casket.



--------------------------------------...



That the papal tiara was routinely worn both before and after a pontifical Mass at the Vatican, is demonstrated by the following 1911 Catholic Encyclopedia entry:



Pontifical Mass



The solemn pontifical Mass celebrated by the pope in St. Peter's has some peculiar ceremonies. ... The pope, wearing the falda, amice, alb, cincture, pectoral cross, stola, cope (mantum), and tiara is carried into the basilica on the sedia gestatoria under the canopy and with the two flabella borne on either side. ... The pope returns to the altar to finish the Mass. After the blessing the assistant priest publishes the plenary indulgence. At the end of the last Gospel the pope goes to the sedia gestatoria, puts on the tiara, and returns in procession as he had entered.



Source: The 1911 Catholic Encyclopedia Online, volume 12.



Crowned Pope Pius XII on the Sedia Gestatoria



Pope John XXIII celebrating Mass at St. Peter's.



Two triple tiaras can be seen on the altar to the Pope's right and a mitre to his left.



--------------------------------------...



Note the following item in a widely circulated Catholic publication from 1938. In it the title Vicarius Filii Dei and 666 is discussed, but the validity of Vicarius Filii Dei as a papal title is not denied:



345. I have heard that he [the pope] is Anti-Christ, and that he was described by St. John as 666, the numerical equivalent of the Latin words of the Pope's title, Vicarius Filii Dei.



That interpretation is absurd, and rejected by all reputable scholars, Catholic and non-Catholic alike. In any case, St. John wrote in Greek, and there is no warrant whatever for the translation to the Latin language. Moreover, whatever be the true interpretation of this mystical number, it certainly refers to some one individual being. If it referred to one particular Pope, it could refer to none of the others. To which Pope will people refer it? To a past Pope? Then he is dead and gone, and we need not worry about him. To the present Pope? He is the very antithesis of all the conditions of the Beast as described by St. John. However, the number does not refer to any of the Popes at all.



Source: Radio Replies, First Volume, by Rev. Dr. Leslie Rumble, M.S.C. and Rev. Charles Mortimer Carty, Copyright 1938, printed by Radio Replies Press, St. Paul 1, Minn., U.S.A., #345, page 80.



--------------------------------------...



So Catholics themselves originally used the phrase VICARIUS FILII DEI in the forged document known as the Donation of Constantine that was held to be genuine for many hundreds of years and Catholics continued to claim that VICARIUS FILII DEI was inscribed on one of the papal mitres as recently as 1915. That Latin title was also apparently mentioned at papal coronations, and the title was not denied in print by Catholic apologists as recently as 1938. I would also suspect, but cannot prove, that there are many documents in the archives of the Catholic Church that contain the exact wording in Latin as described.



An anecdote I can relate to you applies here. In discussing 666 with a fellow coworker one day, he told me that he used to be in training to be a Catholic Priest, and in class one day the priest told the prospective inductees that there was no way to disprove that 666 applied to the papal title, and they would have to live with that fact if they wanted to be priests, or drop out. My friend did not go on to be a priest, though he may have quit for other reasons.



This identification of 666 with the Papal title of Vicarius Fill Dei first surfaced in print in the year 1612 A.D. in a book published in Wittenberg Germany by Andreas Helwig called The Roman Antichrist (Antichristus Romanus). It is available online in Hungarian (.pdf). So the Roman Catholic Church has had over 390 years to conclusively prove it false, yet they have not done so. Why? Because it is true?!



ELLEN WHITE AND 666



Some Catholics will respond to the Seventh-day Adventist that the number 666 can similarly be derived from the name of Ellen Gould White, a prominent figure in the Adventist church (see the article at New Advent). The calculation is made as follows:



E L L E N G O U L D W H I T E



50 50 5 50 500 10 1



The letter "w" in this case, is proposed to be the equivalent of a double "v" or "u", which has a value of 5 and is therefore 10 when doubled.. However, in Latin, a single "v" was used to represent the "w", "v" and "u" sound, the double-u (w) apparently evolved many centuries later in other languages. So, it would seem the correct rendering in Latin would be ELLEN GOVLD VHITE, which does not add up to 666. Be that as it may, lets accept the calculation as stated above. Does this indicate that Ellen White is a likely candidate for the antichrist or beast described in Revelation 13?



Using the same method of calculation, it should be apparent that there might be literally thousands of names that add up to 666, as Rev. Ernest R. Hull demonstrated in the Our Sunday Visitor article above. So obviously the application of the number to any single individual is admittedly quite meaningless, unless and until all the other characteristics of "the antichrist" can be adequately met. Even the Catholics that raise this issue are unlikely to suggest that they seriously consider Ellen White to be the antichrist entity that scripture warns about.



The MAN of Sin



2 Thess 2:3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;



2 Thess 2:4 Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, showing himself that he is God.



Scholars generally agree that the "man of sin" in 2 Thessalonians 2:3 is the same entity described in Revelation as the beast whose number is 666, the "little horn" power of Daniel 7, and the harlot riding the beast in Revelation 17. See the table in The Catholic Origins of Futurism and Preterism. To my knowledge, no Catholic or Protestant scholar has ever proposed that this "antichrist" entity could potentially be a woman. So who then is a likely candidate?



Scholars agree that the Bible is clear about a "man of sin" who will substitute himself for God in the very temple of God. While most of the Christian community has been told to look for a man in the future that will fit this characteristic of Antichrist, the Vicar of Christ has already precisely fulfilled this prophecy for centuries! When the Pope speaks "ex-cathedra", which means from Peter's chair, Catholic's are bound to believe his decree as though it were given from God himself!



--------------------------------------...



So as the Vicar of Christ, the Pope speaks from Peter's chair, in the Cathedral of God, declaring himself to be infallible in defining and declaring unbiblical doctrines which he claims to be essential to salvation as though he were God!



--------------------------------------...



Is this not an exact and precise fulfillment of 2 Thessalonians 2:4 identifying the Papacy as the Antichrist?



Here is just one example of a Papal claim that fits 2 Thess 2:4-



But the supreme teacher in the Church is the Roman Pontiff. Union of minds, therefore, requires, together with a perfect accord in the one faith, complete submission and obedience of will to the Church and to the Roman Pontiff, as to God Himself.



Source: Pope Leo XIII, Encyclical Letter, “On the Chief Duties of Christians as Citizens,” dated January 10, 1890, trans. in The Great Encyclical Letters of Pope Leo XIII (New York: Benziger, 1903), p. 193.



Here is the same encyclical SAPIENTIAE CHRISTIANAE online.



See paragraph #22 for the above quote.



THE NUMBER 666, PAGAN SUN WORSHIP AND ANCIENT BABYLON



"The ancients claimed that God works by mathematics. Their religion was a conglomeration of religion, astrology, alchemy, physical and mental science, and mathematics. Ancient astrology divided the starry heavens into 36 constellations. These were represented by different amulets called "Sigilla Solis," or the sun seal. These amulets were worn by the pagan priests, and they contained all the numbers from 1 to 36. By these figures they claimed to be able to foretell future events. These amulets were usually made of gold, yellow being the sun color. While being carried, these amulets were wrapped in yellow silk, as it was thought that the bearer would thus receive the beneficial powers believed to emanate from the jewel."



"These drawings from photographs taken in 1910, show actual amulets then in the Berlin Museum. They reveal the veneration the ancients had for the sun-god. On the front side of No.1 we see the god of the sun standing on the lion. This indicated the sun's position in the constellation of Leo during the hot days of August. On the back is inscribed "Nachyel," meaning "intelligence of the sun," and in 36 squares are arranged the numerals 1 to 36 (see table 1) in such a way that adding the numbers of any column either horizontally or vertically, and also the two diagonals crossing the square, the total is the same- 111. The sum of the six columns, computed either horizontally or vertically, is 6 x 111, or 666."



"The second illustration is also a solar seal, but it honors the star Basilisco, which was the diminutive form of the Greek basileus (king), thus meaning the same as the Latin regulus. Now, Regulus is the only first-magnitude star in the constellation of Leo. The sun and the moon are again clearly seen on this amulet, and on the reverse side is the same arrangement of numerals, with the actual figure given of the total 666."



[The lower coin shows the conjunction of the Sun, Moon and the star Regulus in the constellation of Leo the Lion that occurred on 19 August 1705.]



Source: Unfolding the Revelation (Revised) by Roy Allan Anderson, pages 125-127, Published and copyrighted 1953, 1961,1974 by Pacific Press Publishing Association, Boise Idaho, Oshawa Ontario, Canada. Library of Congress Catalogue Card No. 61-10884.



--------------------------------------...



Table #1 as illustrated above is also referred to in numerology as the magic Square of the Sun. There are similar magic squares for Saturn, Jupiter, Mars, Venus, Mercury and the Moon, all of which have been known for centuries.



--------------------------------------...



So 666 is a number associated with pagan sun-worship, which originated in the mysteries of ancient pagan Babylon. In Revelation 666 is associated with the number of the beast (from the sea), the Antichrist, and the harlot church of Mystery Babylon. So just who is Babylon?-



1 Pet 5:13 The church that is at Babylon, elected together with you, saluteth you; and so doth Marcus my son.



Read what most *any* commentary says about the above verse and who "Babylon" is. There is absolutely no evidence that Peter ever ministered in literal ancient Babylon. However, early Christians used the term "Babylon" as a veiled code word for a particular city, so as to avoid persecution from that pagan power. That city is Rome.



So the evidence presented here makes 666 a link between ancient sun worshipping pagan Babylon and the Papacy of the Roman Catholic Church, which is dominated by pagan practices and solar images, and referred to as Babylon in the book of Revelation. This is just a small part of the evidence that makes this relationship apparent.



Just as a curiosity, look at this picture of



St. Mary's Catholic Cathedral in San Francisco.



Notice the 3 rows of 6 circled crosses in the design.



Six, Six, Six!



The circled cross is actually the ancient symbol for Baal and Shamash, the pagan Sun god!



See La Verita - The Truth



From the video "666 and the Mark" by James Arrabito,



Copyright ? LLT Productions - Used by Permission



--------------------------------------...



NOTE: 666 is the number of the beast, not the mark.



Catholics,what do you make of THIS?events



It's NOT a waste of time to study the Word of God. The Book of Revelation is the hardest book to understand in the whole Bible. There are more than a couple of interpretations of 666 and the anti-Christ. It's difficult to prove which is right, but it IS a significant question, which will affect all of us during the end-times that are prophesied. I don't know who the anti-Christ will be, but I do agree that the Catholic church teaches some things that contradict the Bible. (but so do some Protestant churches) The problem with the Catholic church is that they believe in a secondary "holy" book besides the Bible. It's called the "Catechism of the Catholic Church" and it's full of teachings that contradict the Word of God. There's a book which can explain some of the false teachings of the Catholic church, and it's called, "Reasoning from the Scriptures with Catholics" by Ron Rhodes. It can probably be found on Amazon.com.



Catholics,what do you make of THIS?home theatre opera theaterThe Catholic Church is the beast mentioned in Rev 13:14-18 and the U.S.A is the beast mentioned in Rev13:11-13 Report It


I don't think that our job is to slam other churches or other life styles



someone has just too much time on his hands Report It


I am Catholic and have something 2 say , Ronald Wilson Reagan . Report It


I am in the process of becoming catholic and you have it all wrong about the Catechism of the Catholic Church....it does not contradict the bible and it is not a secondary holy book...it is a teaching book....it has several rites in there as well. YOU might wanna learn before you SPEAK... Report It


also there is no one true religion everyone worships god in one way or another and god never slanders any religion....and about the number look at the movie the number 23 it is there because we look for it and we want it to be there and we find a way for it to be there... Report It


I think someone goes to a 7th day Adventist church
I am not "moved" by things such as this... That number comes up as pages in books, numbers on credit cards, checks, license plates, etc.... It only affects you, if you let it, and if you are a person that believes in superstition, and witchcraft, etc....
What a waste of brain power.
Catholic or not..anybody can take any number or theory...twist it turn it and make it seem exactly what they want it to be!!!



666 is NOT the number of the beast...its what the author of the passage wants you to believe!!



Don't you have anything else to do??
If you want real Catholic answers visit www.EWTN.com



You should do you own investigating and stop picking debates with catholics. The Holy Spirit is the UNIFIER. Ask yourself if you are working in the Spirit of God.



Jesus asked us to love one another as He does. Conversion is only granted throgh the grace of God. Only God speaks to the hearts of man, in His time.
Interesting but irrelevant. 666 probably referred to Nero or Domitian or some other Roman Emperor who persecuted Christians. Also, remember that 6 is one short of 7, the number of perfection: 666 could be seen as "the epitome of created inadequacy", "an evil trinity which always falls short of the Holy Trinity (777)".



Besides, how could the Catholic Church be the Antichrist when it (and the Orthodox Churches) has preserved the sacraments and the Scriptures through apostolic succession? Christ said that the gates of Hell would not prevail against the Church, after all.
Now I am 100% convinced that Paul is dead and the moon landing were staged in the California desert.



Thanks for the proof!
i agree with robert s
you have way too much time on your hands.



You should spend more time praying, and less time worrying about how other people are praying.
THE HUMAN GOVT is called by the Prophets of old as the government of the BEAST. Thus, that is the beast as the human govt is ruled by a devil called satan. The 666 is the number of beast -a human govt in the endtime that has the power over all the earth and is ruled by the devil who incarnated as the fake-Christ. In the endtime, the fake-Christ will attempt to take over Jerusalem and declare himself as the true MessIah. But his 66.6 million soldiers advance lead by him will be slowed down and they will bivouac instead at the City of Ashdod at the shore of Mediterranean sea. It is so there are two forces of threats that his own force will be facing. They are the 200 million soldiers from the east and at the same time bivouac at the Megiddo valley; while the 20 million soldiers that will be led by the 144,000 kings/ commanders of THE LORD JESUS CHRIST have gone faster and ahead to Jerusalem and had provided the perimeter force against the fake-Christ coming. Those who are professional soldiers understand these tactical postions of three (3) forces which show them in battle formation. Of course, the fake Christ will be beaten by the 200 million soldiers from the east in the Battle of Armageddon at the next dawn but by the will of GOD. Then at 2nd dawn the 200 million soldiers will surround Jerusalem and to attack but at that poiint THE LORD JESUS CHRIST-THE KING OF KINGS AND THE LORD OF LORDS will appear in heaven with the soldiers from heaven and all the 200 million soldiers from the east will be melted on their toes. Then the LORD JESUS CHRIST and HIS prophets and saints after the wrath of GOD pulverizing all man-made on the surface of the Earth by fire from heaven brimstones, meteors, volcanoes, earthquake and floods after 24 hours will descend to earth with THE LORD JESUS CHRIST feet on the Mt of Olives that faces Jerusalem from the east. THANKS GOD; FEAR GOD; PRAISE GOD; GLORIFY GOD; HONOR GOD; LOVE GOD AND WORSHIP GOD. Pls visit my website-http://groups.yahoo.com/group/THEGOODNEW...
Catholics, like other xtians, believe "God is All-knowing". But practice that He is too stupid to know what He is creating and how it will be in the future.



Go figure.



For instance:
666 can mean a lot of things. But Rome is definately the seat of the false-prophet who is also known as the harlot of Revelation.

 
spyware removal